Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211430›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with common variable immunodeficiency and a matched control group: A Danish nationwide cohort study.

Terese L Katzenstein, Line D Rasmussen, Camilla Helberg Drabe, Carsten Schade Larsen, Ann-Brit Eg Hansen, Mette Stærkind, Lene Surland Knudsen, Christian Holm Hansen, Niels Obel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stuck in pandemic uncertainty: a review of the persistent effects of COVID-19 infection in immune-deficient people.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Terese L KatzensteinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Line D RasmussenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Camilla Helberg DrabeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carsten Schade LarsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ann-Brit Eg HansenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette StærkindDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lene Surland KnudsenDepartment of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Christian Holm HansenDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels ObelDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKStatens Serum Institut · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of severe adult respiratory coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the course of the infection among individuals with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) relative to the general population have been a matter of debate. We conducted a Danish nationwide study comparing the timing of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, the risk of first confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, re-infection, and the outcome of infection among individuals with CVID relative to an age- and gender matched control group. Cox regression was used to calculate incidence rate ratios. The CVID patients received SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations earlier than those included in the population control group. Even so, the risks of both first infection and re-infection were increased among the individuals with CVID. The CVID group also had increased risk for hospital contacts due to SARS-CoV-2 infection relative to the general population. However, reassuringly, the risk of mechanical ventilation and death did not differ between the groups, but the numbers were low in both groups, making the estimates uncertain. Though this is the largest study to investigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections and outcomes hereof among individuals with CVID relative to the general population, we cannot rule out minor differences in severity, which might only be detectable with an even larger sample size.

Indexed as

Common Variable ImmunodeficiencyCOVID-19AdultCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesDenmarkHumansReinfectionSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccinesclinical outcomecommon variable immunodeficiency (CVID)inborn errors of immunity (IEI)severe adult respiratory coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)severe novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19)

Identifiers

PMID36211430
PMCPMC9539828
OpenAlexW4296841188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.