Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211310›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society

Six months' follow-up of combined phacoemulsification-kahook dual blade excisional goniotomy.

Nicole Mechleb, Karim Tomey, Daniel Cherfan, Antony Nemr, Georges Cherfan, Syril Dorairaj, Ziad Khoueir

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Visual Function After Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole MechlebFaculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Karim TomeyDepartment of Glaucoma, Beirut Eye and ENT Specialist Hospital, Byblos, Lebanon.
Daniel CherfanDepartment of Glaucoma, Beirut Eye and ENT Specialist Hospital, Byblos, Lebanon.
Antony NemrFaculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Georges CherfanFaculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Syril DorairajDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Ziad KhoueirFaculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Saint Joseph University · LBLebanese American University · LBMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study reports on the combination of excisional goniotomy and cataract extraction in the management of glaucoma in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medication reduction.

methodsThis is a retrospective case series. Twenty-eight eyes of 22 patients with the diagnosis of cataract and ocular hypertension or glaucoma of any stage underwent combined phacoemulsification and Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) goniotomy, between March 2019 and September 2020. The parameters evaluated were postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, mean IOP reduction, number of IOP-lowering medications, and the surgical success rate defined as IOP reduction >20% and/or reduction in glaucoma medications >1.

resultsThe mean IOP reduction at 6 months was 4.5 mmHg (

conclusionCombined phacoemulsification-KDB excisional goniotomy may be an effective and safe alternative to more invasive filtering surgery in glaucoma patients of any stage.

Indexed as

GlaucomagoniotomyKahook Dual Bladephacoemulsification

Identifiers

PMID36211310
PMCPMC9535917
OpenAlexW4304118535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.