Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211302›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Accuracy of preoperative clinical staging for locally advanced gastric cancer in KLASS-02 randomized clinical trial.

Dong Jin Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Young-Kyu Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Ji Yeong An, Hyoung-Il Kim, Hyung-Ho Kim, Seung Wan Ryu, Hoon Hur, Min-Chan Kim and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Dong Jin KimDepartment of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Woo Jin HyungDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Young-Kyu ParkDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
Hyuk-Joon LeeDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Yeong AnDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyoung-Il KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyung-Ho KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Seung Wan RyuDepartment of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea.
Hoon HurDepartment of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
Min-Chan KimDepartment of Surgery, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Seong-Ho KongDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin-Jo KimDepartment of Surgery, Incheon St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, South Korea.
Do Joong ParkDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Keun Won RyuCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Young Woo KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Jong Won KimDepartment of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Joo-Ho LeeDepartment of Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Seoul, South Korea.
Han-Kwang YangDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang-Uk HanDepartment of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
Wook KimDepartment of Surgery, Yeouido St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The discrepancy between preoperative and final pathological staging has been a long-standing challenge for the application of clinical trials or appropriate treatment options. This study aimed to demonstrate the accuracy of preoperative staging of locally advanced gastric cancer using data from a large-scale randomized clinical trial. Materials and methods: Of the 1050 patients enrolled in the clinical trial, 26 were excluded due to withdrawal of consent ( Results: Regarding T staging by computed tomography, accuracy rates were 74.48, 61.62, 58.56, and 85.16% for T1, T2, T3 and T4a, respectively. Multivariate analysis for underestimation of T staging revealed that younger age, ulcerative gross type, circular location, larger tumor size, and undifferentiated histology were independent risk factors. Regarding nodal status estimation, 54.9% of patients with clinical N0 disease were pathologic N0, and 36.4% of patients were revealed to have pathologic N0 among clinical node-positive patients. The percentage of metastasis involvement at the D1, D1+, and D2 lymph node stations significantly increased with the advanced clinical N stage. Among all patients, 29 (2.8%), including 26 with peritoneal seeding, exhibited distant metastases. Conclusions: Estimating the exact pathologic staging remains challenging. A thorough evaluation is mandatory before treatment selection or trial enrollment. Moreover, we need to set a sufficient case number when we design the clinical trial considering the stage migration.

Indexed as

accuracycomputed tomographydiagnosisgastric neoplasmgastroscopy

Identifiers

PMID36211302
PMCPMC9537949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.