Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211299›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Why does patients' discharge delay after vertebral augmentation? A factor analysis of 1,442 patients.

He Zhao, Zhengping Zhang, Yanjun Wang, Bing Qian, Xinhao Cao, Ming Yang, Yangjin Liu, Qinpeng Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incidence and prognostic factors of residual back pain in patients treated for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

He ZhaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Zhengping ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yanjun WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Bing QianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xinhao CaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Ming YangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yangjin LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Qinpeng ZhaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xi'an Honghui Hospital · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Vertebral augmentation techniques are widely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Superior analgesic effects and shortened bed rest time means patients recover quickly, but prolonged unscheduled hospitalization can increase medical expenses and the risk of bed rest complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the reasons for prolonged hospitalization after vertebral augmentation surgery and to determine the relative risk factors. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted to enroll patients with OVCFs and accepted vertebral augmentation surgery from January 2017 to December 2017. Clinical information was collected from the Hospital Information System (HIS). The criterion of delayed discharge was postoperative hospitalization more than 3 days. Telephone interviews and medical history evaluations were conducted to confirm the exact reason for retention. The risk factors were analyzed by multiple logistic regression. Results: Overall, 1,442 patients were included, and 191 (13.2%) stayed in the hospital for more than 3 days postoperatively. The reasons for delayed discharge were psychological factors (37.2%), residual pain (32.5%), cardiopulmonary complications (15.7%), nonspecific symptoms (8.4%), incision abnormalities (2.6%), thrombosis (2.1%), and postanesthesia reactions (1.6%). The multiple logistic model was significant; age (OR 1.028; 95% CI 1.009-1.046), preoperative stay (OR 1.192; 95% CI 1.095-1.298), operation type (OR 1.494; 95% CI 1.019-2.189), and the number of surgical segments (OR 2.238; 95% CI 1.512-3.312) showed statistical significance. In contrast, gender ( Conclusion: Overall, 13.2% of OVCF patients who underwent vertebral augmentation surgery were not discharged within 3 days postoperatively, and several predictors were found. Preoperative communication and comprehensive evaluations are calling for more attention; physicians should adopt an appropriate medical process to enhance rehabilitation in geriatric orthopedics.

Indexed as

delayed dischargeresidual painvertebral augmentationvertebral compression fracturevertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36211299
PMCPMC9538961
OpenAlexW4296997030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.