ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Prognostic factors for trigeminocardiac reflex during cerebrovascular intervention operation.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Call for Vigilance: Trigeminocardiac Reflex Presenting As Ventricular Bigeminy During Marginal Mandibulectomy.Cureus · 2026Article
- Trigeminocardiac reflex during supratentorial craniotomy for intraventricular meningioma: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Trigeminocardiac reflex (TCR) is a brainstem reflexive response of hemodynamic instability during surgery. Identification of risk factors relevant to TCR during cerebrovascular intervention procedures is helpful to efficiently prevent and treat its occurrence. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the risk factors for Onyx embolization during cerebrovascular intervention operation so as to optimize perioperative management strategies on TCR. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on the patients with Onyx embolization under general anaesthesia over 6-years period from 2013 to 2018. 354 patients were finally eligible for inclusion, and then divided into TCR group (group T) and control group (group N). Patient characteristics, clinical diagnosis, comorbidities, lesion sites, hemodynamics changes, and complications were compared between two groups. Several multivariable regression models were applied to analyze the risk factors associated with TCR. Results: TCR occurred in 59 patients (16.7%) among 354 patients. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between two groups ( Conclusion: We found that DAVF and middle meningeal artery embolization were independent risk factors for TCR episodes during Onyx endovascular embolization, highly likely leading to intraoperative hemodynamics fluctuations and postoperative adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.