Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211269›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Stand-alone anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery: A cohort study evaluating a shaped cage without plates or screws.

Xiaolong Chen, Alisha Sial, Charmian Stewart, Jose Vargas Castillo, Ashish D Diwan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without anchoring: a multicenter comparison of stand-alone porous titanium versus anchored PEEK interbody cages.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaolong ChenSpine Labs, St. George / Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Alisha SialSpine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. George Hospital Campus, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Charmian StewartSpine Labs, St. George / Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Jose Vargas CastilloSpine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. George Hospital Campus, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Ashish D DiwanSpine Labs, St. George / Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
St George Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUSutherland Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The anterior approach to the cervical spine is the most commonly used surgery with effective decompression and less surgical trauma. Anterior plate construct (APC) is considered a standard technique. However, it appears to cause implant failure and postoperative dysphagia. Due to these reasons, locking stand-alone cages (LSCs) without the addition of an anterior plate have been developed and gained popularity in the past decade. In theory, an LSC could provide immediate load-bearing support to the anterior column of the cervical spine and may enhance the rate of arthrodesis. However, screw skiving and backing off are known complications of LSC. Given the characteristic shape of cervical discs, we wondered whether there may be a role for a shape-conforming cage without screws and plates to achieve desired outcomes, i.e., a true stand-alone cage (TSC). A single surgeon cohort using the cage in a heterogenic set of indications was evaluated. Methods: A total of 45 patients with degenerative cervical conditions who underwent surgery using TSC using CoRoent Small Contoured peek cage (Nuvasive, San Diego, CA) and Orthoblend™ (Medtronics, Memphis, TN) were retrospectively reviewed. Comparisons between preoperative and postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the modified AAOS-Modems disability outcome, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, and Short Form 36 were evaluated. Operative time, the occurrence rate of fusion, lordosis change of cervical spine, and occurrence rate of complications were evaluated. Results: There were one-level ( Conclusions: TSC yielded satisfactory long-term clinical and radiological outcomes; this preliminary report can form the basis of a cost-benefit analysis study either prospectively or by way of meta-modeling comparing APC, LSC to TSC.

Indexed as

anterior decompressioncervical spondylotic conditionscomplicationfusionstand-alone cage

Identifiers

PMID36211269
PMCPMC9532519
OpenAlexW4296737209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.