Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211245›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2022

Exposure to e-cigarette advertising and provaping websites, and the social acceptability of their use among nicotine users.

Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez, Katia Gallegos-Carrillo, Lizeth Cruz-Jimenez, Rosibel Rodriguez-Bolaños, Edna Arillo-Santillán, James F Thrasher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Awareness of and support for banning e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products among Mexicans who smoke.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Characterizing Anti-Vaping Posts for Effective Communication on Instagram Using Multimodal Deep Learning.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inti Barrientos-GutierrezCenter for Evaluation and Survey Research Mexican National Institute of Public Health Cuernavaca Mexico Center for Evaluation and Survey Research, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Katia Gallegos-CarrilloEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit Mexican Institute of Social Security Cuernavaca Mexico Epidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Lizeth Cruz-JimenezCenter for Evaluation and Survey Research Mexican National Institute of Public Health Cuernavaca Mexico Center for Evaluation and Survey Research, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Rosibel Rodriguez-BolañosPopulation Health Research Center Mexican National Institute of Public Health Cuernavaca Mexico Population Health Research Center, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Edna Arillo-SantillánPopulation Health Research Center Mexican National Institute of Public Health Cuernavaca Mexico Population Health Research Center, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
James F ThrasherArnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina Columbia, SC United States of America Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.

Funding

Electronic cigarettes in Latin America: Evaluation of impacts and policy optionsR01TW010652 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BARNOYA, JOAQUIN, THRASHER, JAMES · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of exposure to Internet communications on and advertising of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and their association with perceptions of the social acceptability of e-cigarettes in Mexico. Methods: Data were analyzed from eight surveys (2018-2021) of an online sample of Mexican adult (> 18 years) smokers and dual users (of combustible and electronic cigarettes). Self-reported exposure to e-cigarette advertising across various marketing channels was assessed, as well as visits to e-cigarette websites. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between perceptions of the social acceptability of e-cigarette use and level of advertising exposure and visits to e-cigarette websites. Results: The Internet and outside e-cigarette stores were where exposure to advertising most occurred, as reported by 47.4% and 46.8% of respondents, respectively. Respondents who noticed e-cigarette advertisements on the Internet (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.43, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.25, 1.63), outside e-cigarette stores (adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.14, 1.50), and in temporary outlets (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01, 1.34), and those who visited e-cigarette websites (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.25, 1.76) were more likely to perceive e-cigarettes as socially acceptable. Noticing advertisements across more channels was also associated with higher perceived social acceptability of e-cigarette use. Conclusions: Being exposed to e-cigarette marketing, either online or through traditional marketing channels, is associated with perceived social acceptability of e-cigarette use, as is contact with provaping sites. Regulatory options to avoid the proliferation of promotional websites disguised as opinion or user sites need to be considered.

Indexed as

advertisingElectronic nicotine delivery systemsmarketingMexicovaping

Identifiers

PMID36211245
PMCPMC9534350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.