ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
A Deep Neural Network-Based Model for Quantitative Evaluation of the Effects of Swimming Training.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What Is Machine Learning, Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning?-Examples of Practical Applications in Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper analyzes the quantitative assessment model of the swimming training effect based on the deep neural network by constructing a deep neural network model and designing a quantitative assessment model of the swimming training effect. This paper addresses the problem of not considering the influence of the uncertainties existing in the virtual environment when evaluating swimming training and adds the power of the delays in the actual training operation environment, which is used to improve the objectivity and usability of swimming training evaluation results. To better measure the degree of influence of uncertainties, a training evaluation software module is developed to validate the usability of the simulated training evaluation method using simulated case data and compare it with the data after training evaluation using the unimproved evaluation method to verify the correctness and objectivity of the evaluation method in this paper. In the experiments, the feature extractor is a deep neural network, and the classifier is a gradient-boosting decision tree with integrated learning advantages. In the experimental comparison, we can achieve more than 60% accuracy and no more than a 1.00% decrease in recognition rate on DBPNN + GBDT, 78.5% parameter reduction, and 54.5% floating-point reduction on DPBNN. We can effectively reduce 32.1% of video memory occupation. It can be concluded from the experiments that deep neural network models are more effective and easier to obtain relatively accurate experimental results than shallow learning when facing high-dimensional sparse features. At the same time, deep neural networks can also improve the prediction results of external learning models. Therefore, the experimental results of this model are most intuitively accurate when combining deep neural networks with gradient boosting decision trees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.