Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36210968›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Diagnosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Deep Neural Networks and Binary Particle Swarm Optimization on Histopathological Images: An AIoMT Approach.

Mohanad A Deif, Hani Attar, Ayman Amer, Ismail A Elhaty, Mohammad R Khosravi, Ahmed A A Solyman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohanad A DeifDepartment of Bioelectronics, Modern University for Technology and Information (MTI), Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-1480
Hani AttarDepartment of Energy Engineering, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8028-7918
Ayman AmerDepartment of Energy Engineering, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Ismail A ElhatyDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4492-2181
Mohammad R KhosraviDepartment of Computer Engineering, Persian Gulf Engineering, Bushehr, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-5067
Ahmed A A SolymanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Nişantaşi University, 34398, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2881-8635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overall prediction of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) remains inadequate, as more than half of patients with oral cavity cancer are detected at later stages. It is generally accepted that the differential diagnosis of OCSCC is usually difficult and requires expertise and experience. Diagnosis from biopsy tissue is a complex process, and it is slow, costly, and prone to human error. To overcome these problems, a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) approach was proposed in this work. A dataset comprising two categories, normal epithelium of the oral cavity (NEOR) and squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC), was used. Feature extraction was performed from this dataset using four deep learning (DL) models (VGG16, AlexNet, ResNet50, and Inception V3) to realize artificial intelligence of medial things (AIoMT). Binary Particle Swarm Optimization (BPSO) was used to select the best features. The effects of Reinhard stain normalization on performance were also investigated. After the best features were extracted and selected, they were classified using the XGBoost. The best classification accuracy of 96.3% was obtained when using Inception V3 with BPSO. This approach significantly contributes to improving the diagnostic efficiency of OCSCC patients using histopathological images while reducing diagnostic costs.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsMouth NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Identifiers

PMID36210968
PMCPMC9546660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.