Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36210800›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2022

Feasibility and ethics of using data from the Scottish newborn blood spot archive for research.

Sarah Cunningham-Burley, Daniel L McCartney, Archie Campbell, Robin Flaig, Clare E L Orange, Carol Porteous, Mhairi Aitken, Ciaran Mulholland, Sara Davidson, Selena M McCafferty and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Sarah Cunningham-Burley *Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, 23 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9LN UK.
Daniel L McCartney *Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3242-0360
Archie Campbell *Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0198-5078
Robin Flaig *Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Nine, Edinburgh Bioquarter, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8007-1279
Clare E L Orange *NHS GGC Biorepository, Level 3, Laboratory Medicine Building, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TY UK.
Carol PorteousCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, 23 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9LN UK.
Mhairi AitkenCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, 23 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9LN UK.
Ciaran MulhollandEdinburgh Clinical Research Facility, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK.
Sara DavidsonEdinburgh Clinical Research Facility, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK.
Selena M McCaffertyNHS GGC Biorepository, Level 3, Laboratory Medicine Building, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TY UK.
Lee MurphyIpsos MORI Scotland, Links House, 15 Links Pl, Edinburgh, EH6 7EZ UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6467-7449
Nicola WrobelIpsos MORI Scotland, Links House, 15 Links Pl, Edinburgh, EH6 7EZ UK.
Sarah McCaffertyIpsos MORI Scotland, Links House, 15 Links Pl, Edinburgh, EH6 7EZ UK.
Karen WallaceMedical Genetics, Room 2:041, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK.
David StClairSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Foresterhill Health Campus, Foresterhill Rd, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN UK.
Shona KerrMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4137-1495
Caroline HaywardMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9405-9550
Andrew M McIntoshCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, EH10 5HF UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0198-4588
Cathie SudlowCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Nine, Edinburgh Bioquarter, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX UK.
Riccardo E MarioniCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4430-4260
Jill PellInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ UK.
Zosia MiedzybrodzkaMedical Genetics, Room 2:041, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK.
David J PorteousCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1249-6106

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127592696Medical Research Council MC_UU_00007/10Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Newborn heel prick blood spots are routinely used to screen for inborn errors of metabolism and life-limiting inherited disorders. The potential value of secondary data from newborn blood spot archives merits ethical consideration and assessment of feasibility for public benefit. Early life exposures and behaviours set health trajectories in childhood and later life. The newborn blood spot is potentially well placed to create an unbiased and cost-effective population-level retrospective birth cohort study. Scotland has retained newborn blood spots for all children born since 1965, around 3 million in total. However, a moratorium on research access is currently in place, pending public consultation. Methods: We conducted a Citizens' Jury as a first step to explore whether research use of newborn blood spots was in the public interest. We also assessed the feasibility and value of extracting research data from dried blood spots for predictive medicine. Results: Jurors delivered an agreed verdict that conditional research access to the newborn blood spots was in the public interest. The Chief Medical Officer for Scotland authorised restricted lifting of the current research moratorium to allow a feasibility study. Newborn blood spots from consented Generation Scotland volunteers were retrieved and their potential for both epidemiological and biological research demonstrated. Conclusions: Through the Citizens' Jury, we have begun to identify under what conditions, if any, should researchers in Scotland be granted access to the archive. Through the feasibility study, we have demonstrated the potential value of research access for health data science and predictive medicine.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyEpigenomics

Identifiers

PMID36210800
PMCPMC9537278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.