Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36209695›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2022

Cognition and the single neuron: How cell types construct the dynamic computations of frontal cortex.

Amelia J Christensen, Torben Ott, Adam Kepecs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Separating cognitive and motor processes in the behaving mouse.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Recent Advances at the Interface of Neuroscience and Artificial Neural Networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amelia J ChristensenDepartment of Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: ameliac@wustl.edu.
Torben OttDepartment of Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: torbenott@wustl.edu.
Adam KepecsDepartment of Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: akepecs@wustl.edu.

Funding

Decision confidence: neural coding and causal circuit mechanisms in behaviorR01MH097061 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KEPECS, ADAM · 2014 to 2024
$4.7M
Functions of distinct orbitofrontal cell-types and pathways in decision makingR01DA038209 · NIDA · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI KEPECS, ADAM · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038209NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frontal cortex is thought to underlie many advanced cognitive capacities, from self-control to long term planning. Reflecting these diverse demands, frontal neural activity is notoriously idiosyncratic, with tuning properties that are correlated with endless numbers of behavioral and task features. This menagerie of tuning has made it difficult to extract organizing principles that govern frontal neural activity. Here, we contrast two successful yet seemingly incompatible approaches that have begun to address this challenge. Inspired by the indecipherability of single-neuron tuning, the first approach casts frontal computations as dynamical trajectories traversed by arbitrary mixtures of neurons. The second approach, by contrast, attempts to explain the functional diversity of frontal activity with the biological diversity of cortical cell-types. Motivated by the recent discovery of functional clusters in frontal neurons, we propose a consilience between these population and cell-type-specific approaches to neural computations, advancing the conjecture that evolutionarily inherited cell-type constraints create the scaffold within which frontal population dynamics must operate.

Indexed as

CognitionFrontal LobeNeurons

Identifiers

PMID36209695
PMCPMC10375540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.