Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36209443›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2022

Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Derrick M Knapik, Varun Gopinatth, Garrett R Jackson, Jorge Chahla, Matthew V Smith, Matthew J Matava, Robert H Brophy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05701592 (Assessment of Outcomes of Double-bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05701592 recruitingnot on this map

Assessment of Outcomes of Double-bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (DB-PCLR)

TypeobservationalSponsorKonrad Malinowski MDRan2022 to 2026Enrolled10ConditionsPosterior Cruciate Ligament TearArmsDB-PCLR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Derrick M KnapikDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. knapik@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8692-4746
Varun GopinatthSaint Louis University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Garrett R JacksonMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jorge ChahlaMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Matthew V SmithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Matthew J MatavaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Robert H BrophyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USRush University · USSaint Louis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the setting of persistent instability or failed non-operative management, surgical reconstruction is commonly recommended for isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears. The purpose of this study was to systematically review published studies to evaluate regional variation in the epidemiology of and surgical approaches to primary, isolated PCL reconstruction.

methodsA systematic review was performed in June 2022 to identify studies examining operative techniques during primary, isolated PCL reconstruction. Collected variables consisted of reconstruction technique, graft type, graft source, tibial reconstruction technique, femoral and tibial drilling and fixation methods, and whether the remnant PCL was preserved or debrided. Studies were classified into four global regions: Asia, Europe, North America, and South America.

resultsForty-five studies, consisting of 1461 total patients, were identified. Most of the included studies were from Asia (69%, n = 31/45). Single bundle reconstruction was more commonly reported in studies out of Asia, Europe, and North America. Hamstring autografts were utilized in 51.7% (n = 611/1181) of patients from Asia and 60.8% (n = 124/204) of patients from Europe. Trans-tibial drilling and outside-in femoral drilling were commonly reported in all global regions. The PCL remnant was generally debrided, while remnant preservation was commonly reported in studies from Asia.

conclusionSurgical treatment of isolated PCL injuries varies by region, with the majority of published studies coming from Asia. Single-bundle reconstruction with hamstring autograft through a trans-tibial approach is the most commonly reported technique in the literature, with males reported to undergo isolated reconstruction more often than females. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, Level IV.

Indexed as

KneePosterior cruciate ligamentReconstructionRegional variation

Identifiers

PMID36209443
PMCPMC9548455
OpenAlexW4303859822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.