ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2022
The composition of cell-based therapies obtained from point-of-care devices/systems which mechanically dissociate lipoaspirate: a scoping review of the literature.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cell-based therapies have disease-modifying effects on osteoarthritis in animal models: A systematic review by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Part 3: Umbilical cord, placenta, and other sources for cell-based injectable therapies.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Pooled it
- Molecular and Cellular Analysis of Lipogems-Processed Lipoaspirates for Evaluating the Efficacy of Treatments in Regenerative Medicine.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction injection for radiation-induced bladder fibrosis: a first-in-human pilot study.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of processing steps on cellular content of mechanical isolated stromal vascular fraction.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Improvement in nanofat preparation technology: Simple and easy-to-use adipose tissue harvesting with Liporevive.JPRAS open · 2025Article
- Potential Medical and Surgical Applications of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells: A Narrative Review.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025Review
- Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Products and Combination Therapies for the Treatment of Pathological Scars: A Review of Current Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Review
- Autologization of Exosomes with Deparenchymized Adipose Tissue: An Innovative Approach for Regenerative Medicine and Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Clinical Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of a Central Current Good Manufacturing Practices Laboratory Produced Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction Cell Therapy Product for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.Stem cells and development · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCell-based therapies using lipoaspirate are gaining popularity in orthopaedics due to their hypothesised regenerative potential. Several 'point-of-care' lipoaspirate-processing devices/systems have become available to isolate cells for therapeutic use, with published evidence reporting their clinical relevance. However, few studies have analysed the composition of their 'minimally-manipulated' cellular products in parallel, information that is vital to understand the mechanisms by which these therapies may be efficacious. This scoping review aimed to identify devices/systems using mechanical-only processing of lipoaspirate, the constituents of their cell-based therapies and where available, clinical outcomes.
methodsPRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles until 21
results2895 studies were screened and a total of 15 articles (11 = Level 5 evidence) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 13 unique devices/systems were identified from included studies. All the studies reported cell concentration (cell number regardless of phenotype per millilitre of lipoaspirate) for their devices/systems (range 0.005-21 × 10
conclusionWhen focussing on cell concentration, cell viability and MSC immuno-phenotypic analysis alone, the most effective manual devices/systems were ones using filtration and cutting/mincing. However, it was unclear whether high performance in these categories would translate to improved clinical outcomes. Due to the lack of standardisation and heterogeneity of the data, it was also not possible to draw any reliable conclusions and determine the role of these devices/systems in clinical practice at present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V Therapeutic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.