ArticleBiophysical journal2022
Targeting disordered-structured domain interactions in Galectin-3 based on NMR and enhanced MD.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conformational dynamics and multimodal interaction of Paxillin with the focal adhesion targeting domain.Science advances · 2025Article
- Conformational dynamics and multi-modal interaction of Paxillin with the Focal Adhesion Targeting Domain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Scrutinising the Conformational Ensemble of the Intrinsically Mixed-Folded Protein Galectin-3.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Galectin-1 and Galectin-3 in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are common and important functional domains in many proteins. However, IDRs are difficult to target for drug development due to the lack of defined structures that would facilitate the identification of possible drug-binding pockets. Galectin-3 is a carbohydrate-binding protein of which overexpression has been implicated in a wide variety of disorders, including cancer and inflammation. Apart from its carbohydrate-recognition/binding domain (CRD), Galectin-3 also contains a functionally important disordered N-terminal domain (NTD) that contacts the C-terminal domain (CTD) and could be a target for drug development. To overcome challenges involved in inhibitor design due to lack of structure and the highly dynamic nature of the NTD, we used a protocol combining nuclear magnetic resonance data from recombinant Galectin-3 with accelerated molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. This approach identified a pocket in the CTD with which the NTD makes frequent contact. In accordance with this model, mutation of residues L131 and L203 in this pocket caused loss of Galectin-3 agglutination ability, signifying the functional relevance of the cavity. In silico screening was used to design candidate inhibitory peptides targeting the newly discovered cavity, and experimental testing of only three of these yielded one peptide that inhibits the agglutination promoted by wild-type Galectin-3. NMR experiments further confirmed that this peptide indeed binds to a cavity in the CTD, not within the actual CRD. Our results show that it is possible to apply a combination of MD simulations and NMR experiments to precisely predict the binding interface of a disordered domain with a structured domain, and furthermore use this predicted interface for designing inhibitors. This procedure can potentially be extended to many other targets in which similar IDR interactions play a vital functional role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.