Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36209354›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022

Deep learning methods hold promise for light fluence compensation in three-dimensional optoacoustic imaging.

Arumugaraj Madasamy, Vipul Gujrati, Vasilis Ntziachristos, Jaya Prakash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Depth-dependent fluence compensation withoutJournal of biomedical optics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Photoacoustic imaging plus X: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Dual-Scan Photoacoustic Tomography for the Imaging of Vascular Structure on Foot.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023
    Article
  16. Deep Learning Enhanced Volumetric Photoacoustic Imaging of Vasculature in Human.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arumugaraj MadasamyIndian Institute of Science, Department of Instrumentation and Applied Physics, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, India.
Vipul GujratiInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany, Germany.
Vasilis NtziachristosInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany, Germany.
Jaya PrakashIndian Institute of Science, Department of Instrumentation and Applied Physics, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceQuantitative optoacoustic imaging (QOAI) continues to be a challenge due to the influence of nonlinear optical fluence distribution, which distorts the optoacoustic image representation. Nonlinear optical fluence correction in OA imaging is highly ill-posed, leading to the inaccurate recovery of optical absorption maps. This work aims to recover the optical absorption maps using deep learning (DL) approach by correcting for the fluence effect.

aimDifferent DL models were compared and investigated to enable optical absorption coefficient recovery at a particular wavelength in a nonhomogeneous foreground and background medium. APPROACH: Data-driven models were trained with two-dimensional (2D) Blood vessel and three-dimensional (3D) numerical breast phantom with highly heterogeneous/realistic structures to correct for the nonlinear optical fluence distribution. The trained DL models such as U-Net, Fully Dense (FD) U-Net, Y-Net, FD Y-Net, Deep residual U-Net (Deep ResU-Net), and generative adversarial network (GAN) were tested to evaluate the performance of optical absorption coefficient recovery (or fluence compensation) with in-silico and in-vivo datasets.

resultsThe results indicated that FD U-Net-based deconvolution improves by about 10% over reconstructed optoacoustic images in terms of peak-signal-to-noise ratio. Further, it was observed that DL models can indeed highlight deep-seated structures with higher contrast due to fluence compensation. Importantly, the DL models were found to be about 17 times faster than solving diffusion equation for fluence correction.

conclusionsThe DL methods were able to compensate for nonlinear optical fluence distribution more effectively and improve the optoacoustic image quality.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPhotoacoustic TechniquesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingSignal-To-Noise Ratiodeep learningfluence correctionimage deconvolutionimage reconstructionoptoacoustic imaging

Identifiers

PMID36209354
PMCPMC9547608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.