ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022
Deep learning methods hold promise for light fluence compensation in three-dimensional optoacoustic imaging.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning for optoacoustic imaging of reversibly switchable proteins: training and performance testing using simulated multispectral optoacoustic tomography images.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Dual SwinUNet architecture for enhanced photoacoustic imaging: a contrastive learning approach in image and sinogram domains.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- A Physics-Informed Neural Network forResearch square · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Towards bridging the synthetic-to-real gap in quantitative photoacoustic tomography via unsupervised domain adaptation.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Depth-dependent fluence compensation withoutJournal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Generative priors-constraint accelerated iterative reconstruction for extremely sparse photoacoustic tomography boosted by mean-reverting diffusion model: Towards 8 projections.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Multi-parametric Photoacoustic Imaging Combined with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging for Applications in Tissue Engineering.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Extractor-attention-predictor network for quantitative photoacoustic tomography.Photoacoustics · 2024Article
- Challenges and advances in two-dimensional photoacoustic computed tomography: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Deep learning acceleration of iterative model-based light fluence correction for photoacoustic tomography.Photoacoustics · 2024Article
- Photoacoustic imaging plus X: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Deep tissue photoacoustic imaging with light and sound.Npj imaging · 2024Review
- Quantitative photoacoustic tomography: modeling and inverse problems.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Dual-Scan Photoacoustic Tomography for the Imaging of Vascular Structure on Foot.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Enhanced Volumetric Photoacoustic Imaging of Vasculature in Human.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Optical Breast Imaging: A Review of Physical Principles, Technologies, and Clinical Applications.Journal of breast imagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
significanceQuantitative optoacoustic imaging (QOAI) continues to be a challenge due to the influence of nonlinear optical fluence distribution, which distorts the optoacoustic image representation. Nonlinear optical fluence correction in OA imaging is highly ill-posed, leading to the inaccurate recovery of optical absorption maps. This work aims to recover the optical absorption maps using deep learning (DL) approach by correcting for the fluence effect.
aimDifferent DL models were compared and investigated to enable optical absorption coefficient recovery at a particular wavelength in a nonhomogeneous foreground and background medium. APPROACH: Data-driven models were trained with two-dimensional (2D) Blood vessel and three-dimensional (3D) numerical breast phantom with highly heterogeneous/realistic structures to correct for the nonlinear optical fluence distribution. The trained DL models such as U-Net, Fully Dense (FD) U-Net, Y-Net, FD Y-Net, Deep residual U-Net (Deep ResU-Net), and generative adversarial network (GAN) were tested to evaluate the performance of optical absorption coefficient recovery (or fluence compensation) with in-silico and in-vivo datasets.
resultsThe results indicated that FD U-Net-based deconvolution improves by about 10% over reconstructed optoacoustic images in terms of peak-signal-to-noise ratio. Further, it was observed that DL models can indeed highlight deep-seated structures with higher contrast due to fluence compensation. Importantly, the DL models were found to be about 17 times faster than solving diffusion equation for fluence correction.
conclusionsThe DL methods were able to compensate for nonlinear optical fluence distribution more effectively and improve the optoacoustic image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.