Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36209335›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Machine learning-based derivation and external validation of a tool to predict death and development of organ failure in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Yixi Xu, Anusua Trivedi, Nicholas Becker, Marian Blazes, Juan Lavista Ferres, Aaron Lee, W Conrad Liles, Pavan K Bhatraju

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial Intelligence Research as a Continuous Clinical Service.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yixi Xu *School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anusua TrivediSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicholas BeckerSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marian BlazesSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Juan Lavista FerresSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aaron LeeSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
W Conrad Liles *School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pavan K Bhatraju *School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. bhatraju@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USSeattle University · USMicrosoft (United States) · US

Funding

Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of diabetic macular edemaK23EY029246 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, AARON · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
The Assessment of Acute Kidney Injury Sub-phenotypes in the Intensive Care UnitK23DK116967 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BHATRAJU, PAVAN KUMAR · 2019 to 2023
$938k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY029246NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK116967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 mortality risk stratification tools could improve care, inform accurate and rapid triage decisions, and guide family discussions regarding goals of care. A minority of COVID-19 prognostic tools have been tested in external cohorts. Our objective was to compare machine learning algorithms and develop a tool for predicting subsequent clinical outcomes in COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from March 2020 to March 2021. Seven Hundred Twelve consecutive patients from University of Washington and 345 patients from Tongji Hospital in China were included. We applied three different machine learning algorithms to clinical and laboratory data collected within the initial 24 h of hospital admission to determine the risk of in-hospital mortality, transfer to the intensive care unit, shock requiring vasopressors, and receipt of renal replacement therapy. Mortality risk models were derived, internally validated in UW and externally validated in Tongji Hospital. The risk models for ICU transfer, shock and RRT were derived and internally validated in the UW dataset but were unable to be externally validated due to a lack of data on these outcomes. Among the UW dataset, 122 patients died (17%) during hospitalization and the mean days to hospital mortality was 15.7 +/- 21.5 (mean +/- SD). Elastic net logistic regression resulted in a C-statistic for in-hospital mortality of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81) in the internal validation and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.89) in the external validation set. Age, platelet count, and white blood cell count were the most important predictors of mortality. In the sub-group of patients > 50 years of age, the mortality prediction model continued to perform with a C-statistic of 0.82 (95% CI:0.76,0.87). Prediction models also performed well for shock and RRT in the UW dataset but functioned with lower accuracy for ICU transfer. We trained, internally and externally validated a prediction model using data collected within 24 h of hospital admission to predict in-hospital mortality on average two weeks prior to death. We also developed models to predict RRT and shock with high accuracy. These models could be used to improve triage decisions, resource allocation, and support clinical trial enrichment.

Indexed as

COVID-19HospitalizationHumansMachine LearningPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36209335
PMCPMC9547892
OpenAlexW4303645608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.