Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36209227›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2022

Moving towards a continuum of safer supply options for people who use drugs: A qualitative study exploring national perspectives on safer supply among professional stakeholders in Canada.

Annie Foreman-Mackey, Bernie Pauly, Andrew Ivsins, Karen Urbanoski, Manal Mansoor, Geoff Bardwell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Harm Reduction in Inpatient Hospital Settings: An Ethics (Principlist) Analysis.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Safer opioid supply via a biometric dispensing machine: a qualitative study of barriers, facilitators and associated outcomes.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annie Foreman-MackeyBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, V6Z 2A9, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bernie PaulyCanadian Institute on Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Avenue, V8P 5C2, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Andrew IvsinsBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, V6Z 2A9, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Karen UrbanoskiCanadian Institute on Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Avenue, V8P 5C2, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Manal MansoorBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, V6Z 2A9, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Geoff BardwellBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, V6Z 2A9, Vancouver, BC, Canada. geoff.bardwell@bccsu.ubc.ca.
British Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel public health interventions are needed to address the toxic drug supply and meet the needs of people who use drugs amidst the overdose crisis. Safer supply - low-barrier distribution of pharmaceutical grade substances - has been implemented in some jurisdictions to provide safer alternatives to the unregulated drug supply, yet no studies to date have explored professional stakeholder perspectives on this approach.

methodsWe used purposive sampling to recruit professional stakeholders (n = 17) from four locations in British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia, including program managers, executive directors, political and health authority representatives, and healthcare providers involved in the design, implementation, and/or operation of safer supply programs in their communities. Semi-structured, one-to-one interviews were conducted, and interview data were coded and analyzed using thematic analyses.

resultsParticipants defined safer supply as low-barrier access to substances of known quality and quantity, offered on a continuum from prescribed to a legal, regulated supply, and focused on upholding autonomy and liberation of people who use drugs. Stakeholders expressed support for safer supply but explained that current iterations do not meet the needs of all people who use drugs and that implementation is limited by a lack of willing prescribers, stigma towards people who use drugs, and precarity of harm reduction programs to political ideology. Stakeholders expressed strong support for wider-reaching approaches such as decriminalization, legalization, and regulation of substances as a way to fully realize a continuum of safer supply, directly address the overdose crisis and toxic drug supply, and ensure equity of access nationally.

conclusionThe results of this study highlight the need for innovative strategies to address the overdose crisis and that safer supply has the potential to benefit certain people who use drugs. A one-size-fits-all approach is not sufficient and the perspectives of professional stakeholders should be considered alongside those of people who use drugs when designing and implementing future safer supply.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseHarm ReductionBritish ColumbiaCanadaHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsQualitative ResearchPharmaceutical PreparationsCanadaOverdose preventionQualitative researchSafer supplyStakeholder perspectives

Identifiers

PMID36209227
PMCPMC9547673
OpenAlexW4303684465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.