ArticleBMC biology2022
Toward efficient and high-fidelity metagenomic data from sub-nanogram DNA: evaluation of library preparation and decontamination methods.
Article in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The core microbiome of the AMF hyphosphere: mineralization mechanisms of key soil mineral elements.Mycorrhiza · 2026Review
- Using Carrier DNA in Ultra-Low Input Library Preparations for Next-Generation Sequencing.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2026Article
- Enrichment of the commensal microbiome in the lower respiratory tract is associated with improved outcomes following lung transplantation.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- The influence of vaginal microbiota on ewe fertility: a metagenomic and functional genomic approach.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants and potential co-infected pathogens in hospitalized patients based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unveiling microbial diversity: harnessing long-read sequencing technology.Nature methods · 2024Review
- Enhancing Clinical Utility: Utilization of International Standards and Guidelines for Metagenomic Sequencing in Infectious Disease Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Toward efficient and high-fidelity metagenomic data from sub-nanogram DNA: evaluation of library preparation and decontamination methods.BMC biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShotgun metagenomic sequencing has greatly expanded the understanding of microbial communities in various biological niches. However, it is still challenging to efficiently convert sub-nanogram DNA to high-quality metagenomic libraries and obtain high-fidelity data, hindering the exploration of niches with low microbial biomass.
resultsTo cope with this challenge comprehensively, we evaluated the performance of various library preparation methods on 0.5 pg-5 ng synthetic microbial community DNA, characterized contaminants, and further applied different in silico decontamination methods. First, we discovered that whole genome amplification prior to library construction led to worse outcomes than preparing libraries directly. Among different non-WGA-based library preparation methods, we found the endonuclease-based method being generally good for different amounts of template and the tagmentation-based method showing specific advantages with 0.5 pg template, based on evaluation metrics including fidelity, proportion of designated reads, and reproducibility. The load of contaminating DNA introduced by library preparation varied from 0.01 to 15.59 pg for different kits and accounted for 0.05 to 45.97% of total reads. A considerable fraction of the contaminating reads were mapped to human commensal and pathogenic microbes, thus potentially leading to erroneous conclusions in human microbiome studies. Furthermore, the best performing in silico decontamination method in our evaluation, Decontam-either, was capable of recovering the real microbial community from libraries where contaminants accounted for less than 10% of total reads, but not from libraries with heavy and highly varied contaminants.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that high-quality metagenomic data can be obtained from samples with sub-nanogram microbial DNA by combining appropriate library preparation and in silico decontamination methods and provides a general reference for method selection for samples with varying microbial biomass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.