Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36209213›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2022

Toward efficient and high-fidelity metagenomic data from sub-nanogram DNA: evaluation of library preparation and decontamination methods.

Chun Wang, Li Zhang, Xuan Jiang, Wentai Ma, Hui Geng, Xue Wang, Mingkun Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chun Wang *Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.
Li Zhang *Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China. zhangl@big.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-7615-4976
Xuan JiangBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.
Wentai MaBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.
Hui GengDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xue WangBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, 100013, China.
Mingkun LiBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China. limk@big.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNKunming Institute of Zoology · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShotgun metagenomic sequencing has greatly expanded the understanding of microbial communities in various biological niches. However, it is still challenging to efficiently convert sub-nanogram DNA to high-quality metagenomic libraries and obtain high-fidelity data, hindering the exploration of niches with low microbial biomass.

resultsTo cope with this challenge comprehensively, we evaluated the performance of various library preparation methods on 0.5 pg-5 ng synthetic microbial community DNA, characterized contaminants, and further applied different in silico decontamination methods. First, we discovered that whole genome amplification prior to library construction led to worse outcomes than preparing libraries directly. Among different non-WGA-based library preparation methods, we found the endonuclease-based method being generally good for different amounts of template and the tagmentation-based method showing specific advantages with 0.5 pg template, based on evaluation metrics including fidelity, proportion of designated reads, and reproducibility. The load of contaminating DNA introduced by library preparation varied from 0.01 to 15.59 pg for different kits and accounted for 0.05 to 45.97% of total reads. A considerable fraction of the contaminating reads were mapped to human commensal and pathogenic microbes, thus potentially leading to erroneous conclusions in human microbiome studies. Furthermore, the best performing in silico decontamination method in our evaluation, Decontam-either, was capable of recovering the real microbial community from libraries where contaminants accounted for less than 10% of total reads, but not from libraries with heavy and highly varied contaminants.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that high-quality metagenomic data can be obtained from samples with sub-nanogram microbial DNA by combining appropriate library preparation and in silico decontamination methods and provides a general reference for method selection for samples with varying microbial biomass.

Indexed as

DecontaminationMetagenomicsDNAEndonucleasesGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNADNAEndonucleasesEfficiency and FidelityIn silico decontaminationLibrary preparationLow microbial biomassMetagenomicsSub-nanogram DNA

Identifiers

PMID36209213
PMCPMC9548135
OpenAlexW4303684652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.