ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2022
3D accuracy and clinical outcomes of corrective osteotomies with patient-specific instruments in complex upper extremity deformities: an approach for investigation and correlation.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06603831 (Randomized, Prospective and Multicenter Clinical Study for the Clinical Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 3D Digital Surgery in Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Prospective and Multicenter Clinical Study for the Clinical Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 3D Digital Surgery in Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies for surgical reconstruction of complex elbow deformities based on patient-specific instruments - a case series and narrative review.Innovative surgical sciences · 2026Article
- Efficacy of 3D-printed surgical guides in the correction of pediatric cubitus varus deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES international · 2026Review
- An automatic congenital radio-ulnar synostosis deformity evaluation method (CRUS-DE): integrating TLT-SAM and GPMM-R for landmark identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of 3D Imaging and Printing in Proximal Humerus Fractures and Sequelae.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Application of 3D printing for customised treatment of upper limb disorders.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Article
- Patient-Specific Guides for Accurate and Precise Positioning of Osseointegrated Implants in Transfemoral Amputations: A Proof-of-Concept In Vitro Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCorrective osteotomies of the upper extremities with patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are increasingly used. In this context, the concordance between planning and postoperative 3D radiographs as well as the association between 3D accuracy and clinical outcome has rarely been evaluated. In this pilot study, we aimed to investigate our clinical mid-term outcome and 3D accuracy as well as their possible correlation, including identifying aspects critical to reaching optimal correction results.
methodsFrom October 2018 to January 2020, we used PSIs for 12 corrective osteotomies of the upper extremity in 11 bones of 8 patients (congenital or posttraumatic deformities in 2 elbows, 3 forearms, 3 distal radii). In follow-up examination (10-25 months postoperatively), patient satisfaction, grip strength, ROM, VAS, and DASH were evaluated. Three-dimensional radiological accuracy was determined with 3D-reconstructed postoperative CT scans. With the software tool "Part Comparison" of Mimics
resultsCompared to the preoperative situation pain and function were better at follow-up: The average VAS score significantly decreased from 6.5 ± 4.1 cm preoperatively to 2.3 ± 2.6 cm at the follow-up time point (p = 0.008). The average DASH score significantly improved, from 48.4 ± 30.9 to 27.0 ± 25.2 (p = 0.015). In the part comparison analysis "planned vs postoperative comparison", significantly more points in percent (= 3D accuracy) were in a -3 mm to 3 mm interval than in the "preoperative vs planned comparison" (87.3 ± 13.8% vs 48.9 ± 16.6%, p = 0.004). After surgery, the maximum deviation value over all cases was 4.5 ± 1.1 mm, and the minimum deviation value was - 4.5 ± 1.2 mm vs preoperatively 12.9 ± 6.2 mm (p = 0.004) and - 7.2 ± 2.1 mm (p = 0.02), respectively. Clinically, in all cases with higher accuracy (> 90%), an improvement of either DASH or VAS or both of > 60% to the preoperative values occurred. There was a significant correlation between accuracy (%) and ΔVAS (p = 0.004). There were no method-related complications.
conclusionsOur data after PSI-based corrective osteotomy in complex deformities of the upper extremity in a limited number of cases indicate a positive correlation between 3D accuracy and clinical outcomes. Examination of 3D accuracy to analyse sources of error in the hole procedure from initial CT scan to end of surgery even in patients with not fully satisfactory clinical results is required for further development of the method to achieve optimal correction results with nearly 100% congruence between the planned and postoperative 3D bone position. Trial registration This retrospective study was registered in the Center for Translational & Clinical Research Aachen (CTC-A) with the number 20-514 on November 20, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.