Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36209121›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2022

Two decades of FDG-PET/CT in seminoma: exploring its role in diagnosis, surveillance and follow-up.

Ciara Conduit, Thuan Tzen Koh, Michael S Hofman, Guy C Toner, Jeremy Goad, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Keen-Hun Tai, Jeremy H Lewin, Ben Tran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ciara ConduitDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, 3031, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Thuan Tzen KohMolecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael S HofmanSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Guy C TonerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, 3031, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jeremy GoadDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nathan LawrentschukDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Keen-Hun TaiSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Jeremy H LewinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, 3031, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ben TranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, 3031, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. ben.tran@petermac.org.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvivors of testicular cancer may experience long-term morbidity following treatment. There is an unmet need to investigate techniques that can differentiate individuals who need additional therapy from those who do not. 2-

methodsA institutional FDG-PET/CT database of scans performed between 2000 and 2020 for adults with testicular seminoma was interrogated. Endpoints of interest included the positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value of FDG-PET/CT for identifying active seminoma (defined by progressive radiology, response to treatment or biopsy); or no active seminoma within 24-months for patients with stage 1 and advanced seminoma. An exploratory analysis examining predictive role of SUV

results249 patients met eligibility criteria for the analysis, including 184 patients with stage 1 and 77 patients with advanced testicular seminoma. Of 193 FDG-PET/CT performed in stage 1 seminoma with available follow-up data, 79 were performed during active surveillance. 18 (23%) of these were positive, all of which had confirmed recurrent seminoma (PPV 100%). Of 45 negative FDG-PET/CT during active surveillance, 4 recurrences developed corresponding to a NPV 91%. When clinical suspicion precipitated FDG-PET/CT (n = 36): PPV 100%, NPV 86%. Of 145 FDG-PET/CT in advanced seminoma with available follow-up data, 25 (17%) were performed at baseline (within 2 months of diagnosis), 70 (48%) post-treatment for evaluation of treatment response and 50 (34%) during follow-up following prior curative treatment. 10 (14%) post-treatment FDG-PET/CT were positive corresponding to a PPV 60%. Of 46 negative FDG-PET/CT, 5 recurrences occurred (NPV 89%). During follow-up after prior curative treatment, 24 (50%) FDG-PET/CT were positive corresponding to a PPV 83%; of 20 negative FDG-PET/CT, 1 recurrence occurred, NPV 95%. When clinical suspicion indicated FDG-PET/CT (n = 36): PPV 100%, NPV 94%.

conclusionFDG-PET/CT offers high PPV for identifying seminoma and accurately predicts non-recurrence across a clinically relevant 24-months. Notably, FDG-PET/CT may prevent unnecessary treatment in 45% of patients undergoing investigation for clinical suspicion of recurrence during follow-up of advanced seminoma. The use of FDG-PET/CT in selected patients now, may help prevent unnecessary treatment of people with testicular seminoma.

Indexed as

SeminomaTesticular NeoplasmsAdultFluorodeoxyglucose F18Follow-Up StudiesGlucoseHumansMalePositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlucoseRadiopharmaceuticalsBiomarkerscancer survivorsPET-CT scanSeminomasTesticular neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID36209121
PMCPMC9548159
OpenAlexW4303673915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.