ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022
Rare disease curative care expenditure-financing scheme-health provider-beneficiary group analysis: an empirical study in Sichuan Province, China.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing regional rare disease management systems within China's policy framework: practical insights from the shantou experience.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
- Curative care expenditure across different comorbidity states of chronic hepatitis B: a prevalence study in Sichuan Province, China.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Reforming China's Rare Disease Security System: Risk Management Perspectives and a Dedicated Insurance Innovation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A retrospective study of insurance coverage status and economic cost of rare diseases in Hainan Province.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An analysis of curative care expenditure for Parkinson's disease under different comorbidity conditions: an empirical study based on China.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Perception of recurrence risk in patients with IgG4-related disease: a descriptive phenomenological study.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Article
- The role of public health in rare diseases: hemophilia as an example.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Approval status of essential therapeutic drugs for systemic sclerosis versus that of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRare diseases impose a heavy economic burden on patients' families and society worldwide. This study used the samples from Sichuan Province in China to estimate the curative care expenditure (CCE) of ten rare diseases, for supporting the prioritization of rare disease health policies.
methodsMulti-stage cluster sampling method was adopted to investigate 9714 rare disease patients from 1556 medical institutions in Sichuan Province. Based on the System of Health Accounts 2011, this study estimated the total CCE of 10 rare diseases, financing schemes, and their allocation among different medical institutions and groups of people.
resultsIn 2018, the total CCE of the ten rare diseases was $19.00 million, the three costliest rare diseases were Hemophilia ($4.38 million), Young-onset Parkinson's disease ($2.96 million), and Systemic Sclerosis ($2.45 million). Household out-of-pocket expenditure (86.00% for outpatients, 41.60% for inpatients) and social health insurance (7.85% for outpatients; 39.58% for inpatients) were the main sources of financing CCE. The out-of-pocket expenditures for patients with Young-onset Parkinson's disease, Congenital Scoliosis, and Autoimmune Encephalitis accounted for more than 60% of the total CCE. More than 80% of the rare disease CCE was incurred in general hospitals. The 40-59 age group accounted for the highest CCE (38.70%) while men spent slightly more (55.37%) than women (44.64%).
conclusionsAs rare disease treatment is costly and household out-of-pocket expenditure is high, we suggest taking steps to include rare disease drugs in the National Reimbursement Drug List and scientifically re-design insurance coverage. It is also necessary to explore a multi-tiered healthcare security system to pay for the CCE of rare diseases and reduce the economic burden on patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.