Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36209065›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2022

Occurrence of waterborne pathogens and antibiotic resistance in water supply systems in a small town in Mozambique.

Elisa Taviani, Harold van den Berg, Fernando Nhassengo, Eugenia Nguluve, Jussa Paulo, Olivia Pedro, Giuliana Ferrero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Faecal Coliforms andMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Elisa TavianiCenter of Biotechnology, University Eduardo Mondlane, Avenida de Moçambique Km 1.5, Maputo, Mozambique. elisa.taviani@unige.it.
Harold van den BergNational Institute for Public Health and The Environment (RIVM), WHO Collaborating Centre for Risk Assessment of Pathogens in Food and Water, P.O. Box 1, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Fernando NhassengoCenter of Biotechnology, University Eduardo Mondlane, Avenida de Moçambique Km 1.5, Maputo, Mozambique.
Eugenia NguluveCollins Ltd, Rua Joseph Ki-zerbo, N. 119 Bairro da Sommerschield, Maputo, Mozambique.
Jussa PauloCenter of Biotechnology, University Eduardo Mondlane, Avenida de Moçambique Km 1.5, Maputo, Mozambique.
Olivia PedroCenter of Biotechnology, University Eduardo Mondlane, Avenida de Moçambique Km 1.5, Maputo, Mozambique.
Giuliana FerreroIHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611 AX, Delft, The Netherlands.
Eduardo Mondlane University · MZCollins College · USDelft University of Technology · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background. Microbiological quality of drinking water supplied in Moamba, a small town in southern Mozambique, was assessed by collecting and analyzing 91 water sample from 5 sampling sites: raw or inlet water, treated water and 3 household taps along the water distribution system. The presence of Escherichia coli as indicator fecal contamination, three bacterial pathogens, Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella and Campylobacter spp., and Cefotaximee resistant E. coli as antibiotic resistance determinant, was assessed.

results. The results showed fecal contamination in all types of water samples: E. coli was found in 100% of inlet water samples, in 21% of treated water samples, and in 22% of tap water samples. No Salmonella spp. was detected during the study. The presence of V. cholerae was detected in 42% of all water samples tested: 100% of inlet water samples, in 16% of treated water samples, and in 23% household tap water samples. All V. cholerae confirmed isolates where genotyped by PCR as non-O1/non-O139; however, 9 isolates showed the presence of the genes encoding for cholera toxin. The presence of Campylobacter spp. was detected in 36% of the water samples tested: in 95% of inlet water samples, in 10% of treated water samples and in 23% household tap water samples. Cefotaxime resistant E. coli was detected in 63% of inlet water, 16% of treated water, and in 9% of tap water samples, these isolates were also resistant to multiple other antibiotics: ampicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline chloramphenicol. All 70 V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 confirmed isolated were resistant to ampicillin, 51% to streptomycin, 13% to gentamycin, and 1 isolate was resistant to tetracycline; 13% showed a multi-drug resistant profile, being resistant to at least three antibiotics.

conclusion. The presence of fecal contamination and pathogens in the water treatment system and household taps in Moamba indicates a health risk for the population. This burden increases by the presence of bacterial pathogens showing multidrug resistance.

Indexed as

CholeraDrinking WaterVibrio choleraeAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeChloramphenicolCholera ToxinDrug Resistance, MicrobialEscherichia coliGentamicinsHumansMozambiqueStreptomycinTetracyclinesWater MicrobiologyAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeChloramphenicolCholera ToxinDrinking WaterGentamicinsStreptomycinTetracyclines

Identifiers

PMID36209065
PMCPMC9547466
OpenAlexW4303644889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.