ArticleBMC neurology2022
Risk and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection among patients with multiple sclerosis vs. the general population: a population-based study.
Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Association Between Online Education and Mental Health Among Medical Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Outcome of COVID-19 Infection in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Who Received Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of BBIBP-CorV vaccine in preventing SARS-CoV2 infection and severe outcomes in people living with multiple sclerosis: A population-based study.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe conducted this study to compare the risk of reinfection between multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and a control group without MS.
methodIn this retrospective study, data of all SARS-CoV-2 tests (n = 793,301) and almost all MS patients (n = 10,639) in Isfahan province were collected from January 01, 2020 to August 22, 2021. Of the 2196 MS patients and 793,301 persons from the general population who had been tested at least once, 3 control for each MS patient were identified, leaving 1560 MS patients and 4680 controls without MS. We compared the risk of reinfection after 90 days of a primary infection between those with and without a previous positive COVID-19 test.
results736 (47.2%) MS patients and 2013 (43.0%) control individuals had at least one positive test. A total of 17 (2.3%) and 22 (1.1%) possible reinfections in MS and control groups were observed. The estimated protection against reinfection in all MS patients, MS patients on rituximab, MS patients on DMTs rather than rituximab, and controls were 68.2% (46.2, 81.2%), 57.4% (- 0.1, 83.1%), 71.5% (45.5, 85.2%), and 82.1% (72.1, 88.5%), respectively. We found no statistically significant difference in estimated protection (p = 0.123) and odd of reinfection (adjusted OR: 2.01 [0.98, 4.08]) between all MS patients and control group. Two patients were hospitalized at first infection but none required hospitalization at reinfection event.
conclusionsMS patients on rituximab may be at a greater risk of reinfection. Further studies are required to assess the risk of the second reinfection among the MS population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.