Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36208985›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2022

Parents' Acceptance of COVID-19 Compared to Human Papillomavirus Vaccines.

Alison Footman, Nita Kanney, Linda M Niccolai, Gregory D Zimet, Edgar Turner Overton, Susan L Davies, Barbara Van Der Pol

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alison FootmanUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama. Electronic address: afootman@uab.edu.
Nita KanneyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama.
Linda M NiccolaiDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Gregory D ZimetIndiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Edgar Turner OvertonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.
Susan L DaviesTulane University, School of Social Work, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Barbara Van Der PolUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama; University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USTulane University · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe first vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) for adolescents 16 years and older in the United States received Emergency Use Authorization in December 2020. Soon after its approval, parents expressed concerns about vaccine safety for adolescents. Similar concerns about vaccine safety partially explain suboptimal human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake. This qualitative study explores similarities and differences in parents' attitudes about these two vaccines.

methodsParents were recruited through social media and at health centers in Alabama. Semi-structured interviews with parents of adolescents aged 9-17 years were conducted before and after Alabama expanded age eligibility to those 16 and older. Topics included knowledge about HPV and COVID-19 vaccines, and parents' intentions to have children vaccinated. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsFrom March 11, 2021 to April 24, 2021, 21 in-depth interviews were conducted. Parents discussed the importance of HPV and COVID-19 vaccines for protecting their children's health but differences between the two related to community protection. Parents were concerned about vaccine safety but media coverage about the COVID-19 vaccine led to more favorable attitudes about the benefits of vaccination, which was not observed for HPV vaccines. Instead for HPV vaccination, parents wanted their healthcare providers' opinions about the vaccine before making a vaccination decision. DISCUSSION: Parents had similar concerns about HPV and COVID-19 vaccines. Although provider recommendations can improve vaccine uptake, local news reports were seen to have a positive impact on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in lieu of provider recommendation. Disseminating information online could be beneficial to promote HPV and COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentChildCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSARS-CoV-2United StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentsCOVID-19 vaccinationHPV vaccinationParent approval

Identifiers

PMID36208985
PMCPMC9533113
OpenAlexW4301603391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.