ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022
Contemporary evaluation of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression in breast cancer-associated stroma.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate nuclear estrogen receptor α (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) patterns in the stroma surrounding invasive carcinoma and assess associations with clinicopathologic features.
methodsA retrospective database search (1/2017-12/2020) identified breast core biopsies with invasive carcinoma. ERα/PR IHC expression in invasive carcinoma and stromal cells was categorized visually as positive (> 10%), low positive (1-10%) or negative (< 1%). Tumors were divided into 4 subtypes by IHC: Luminal, Luminal HER2, HER2 enriched, and triple negative. Clinicopathologic features associated (univariate p-value < 0.15) with ERα/PR stromal expression were investigated further using stepwise multivariable logistic regression.
resultsOf 1512 biopsies, 1278 had accessible IHC. 55.6% (711/1278) and 10.4% (133/1274) of cases showed cancer-associated stromal fibroblast expression of ERα and PR, respectively. Stromal ER positivity was significantly associated with use of the Ventana (with SP1 clone) versus Leica (with 6F11 clone) platform and in cases with Luminal cancer subtype. PR stromal expression was significantly associated with Luminal subtype, obesity, and younger age.
conclusionsExpression of ERα and PR in breast cancer-associated stroma showed associations that suggest both biologic and analytic influence. Reproducible expression patterns may inform expansion of ERα/PR guidelines for the assessment of internal controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.