Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36208318›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

The impact and implications of virtual supportive cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: integrating patient and clinician perspectives.

Jane Evered, Lucy Andersen, Anessa Foxwell, Christin Iroegbu, Clare Whitney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Models, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of supportive care in cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jane EveredDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1100 Delaplaine CT, Madison, WI, 53711, USA. jevered@wisc.edu.
Lucy AndersenUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anessa FoxwellUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christin IroegbuUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Clare WhitneyUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Individualized Care for At Risk Older AdultsT32NR009356 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Lauren M Massimo, MARY D NAYLOR · 2007 to 2026
$7.8M
Health Resources and Services Administration T32HP10010HRSA HHS T32HP10010National Institute of Nursing Research T32NR009356NINR NIH HHS T32 NR009356NINR NIH HHS T32NR009356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany cancer centers made rapid shifts in supportive care delivery modalities at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Improving virtual supportive cancer care requires deeply understanding both patient's and clinician's experiences. We aimed to integrate the perspectives of clinicians and patients to describe the transition to virtual supportive cancer care during COVID-19.

methodsIn clinical-academic partnership between a multi-site cancer care center in the Northeastern USA and a school of nursing, we conducted a study using dimensional analysis method. Theoretical sampling drove recruitment of patients and clinicians who engaged in virtual supportive cancer care from March 15, 2020 to December 15, 2020. In this sub-analysis, we coded the dimensional analysis data from semi-structured interviews using a descriptive approach with inductive conventional content analysis.

resultsWe interviewed 17 clinicians, 18 patients, and 3 care partners about their experiences. We integrate patient and clinician perspectives in four in vivo categories: "When COVID hit," "Not an IT expert," "Those little moments," and "The mothership."

conclusionThe findings uncover shared patient and clinician fears of missing or sub-optimal care at the onset of COVID-19, technological and relational challenges to engaging in care, and the mixed impacts of virtual care on access, convenience, and efficiency. This analysis suggests concrete action items to improve virtual supportive care for patients and clinicians. The findings corroborate the importance of convenience, access, and efficiency as care quality indicators and suggest potential to emphasize the clinician-patient relationship as an additional indicator of care quality.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsTelemedicineHumansPandemicsQuality of Health CareResearchCancerCOVID-19QualitativeSupportive careTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID36208318
PMCPMC9547569
OpenAlexW4303647636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.