Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36208194›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nursing management2022

Caregivers' experiences and perspectives on caring for the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative systematic review.

Huichao Zhang, Yuan Wu, Nannan Wang, Xuhan Sun, Yuqing Wang, Yuxi Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nursing management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huichao ZhangSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5959-6756
Yuan WuSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9750-9297
Nannan WangSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xuhan SunSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0195-2305
Yuqing WangSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-6006
Yuxi ZhangGeriatric Hematology/Radiotherapy Ward, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7041-9195
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71704084Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province SJCX22_0701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe goal of this study was to explore caregivers' experiences, perspectives, emotions, knowledge and needs in caring for older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. These included, but were not limited to, experiences in hospital care, home care and nursing home care.

backgroundBecause of the high mortality rate associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, senior care is critical. During the COVID-19 pandemic, caregivers caring for older people have had unique experiences potentially affecting the quality of care provided. This topic has received substantial attention since the start of the pandemic and has been studied by numerous researchers. However, experiences may differ among countries and time periods. In addition, no qualitative systematic reviews on this topic appear to have been published. EVALUATION: In this systematic review of qualitative studies, data were collected from the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Science Direct and PsycINFO. Titles and abstracts were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, full texts were screened and the methodological quality of included studies was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research by two independent reviewers. KEY ISSUE(S): A total of 141 findings were extracted and aggregated into 20 categories; 6 synthesized findings were identified.

conclusionThis review indicates caregivers' experiences and perceptions regarding caring for older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of a qualitative systematic review show that caregivers' emotions, cognitions and knowledge have affected the quality of caregivers' senior care services during the pandemic. Caregivers caring for older adults should practise self-awareness, understanding their knowledge and attitudes to improve the quality of senior care. Moreover, health care administrators and policymakers should make concerted efforts to cultivate a better working environment. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Managers should formulate timely and effective management strategies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the workload of caregivers has increased, thus requiring better scheduling by managers. Furthermore, managers should consider the negative emotions of caregivers and prevent negative emotions from affecting their work. Besides, virtual technology should be applied to senior care and psychological support be provided for caregivers in this special care setting.

Indexed as

COVID-19Home Care ServicesAgedCaregiversHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchcaregiversCOVID-19geriatricsnursesqualitative systematic review

Identifiers

PMID36208194
PMCPMC9874760
OpenAlexW4303646845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.