ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
Dosimetric and feasibility evaluation of a CBCT-based daily adaptive radiotherapy protocol for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective multi-institutional study of library-based adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Evaluation of plan-of-the-day selection and population analysis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Trial
- Cone beam computed tomography guided online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical Cancer: Two-year single-Centre implementation and clinical experience.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Development of CBCT-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- A Comparative, Multiobserver Analysis of Nodal Contouring Methods in Pelvic Online Cone Beam-Based Adaptive Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- CBCT-based adaptive radiotherapy and automated radiotherapy decision-making systems: development and current status.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Solution for the hot spots in adaptive radiotherapy planning for cervical cancer: a case report and review of literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Assessment of TrueBeam kV Cone-Beam CT Image Quality and the Clinical Impact of Calibration Drift.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- A global bibliometric and visualization study of the adaptive radiotherapy research landscape.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Simulation-free cone beam CT-based online adaptive radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences and Technologies in Adaptive Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Review
- Pelvic dose accumulation accuracy in a CBCT based online adaptive radiotherapy system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Quantitative and automatic plan-of-the-day assessment to facilitate adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Scatter and beam hardening effect corrections in pelvic region cone beam CT images using a convolutional neural network.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Adaptive Target Volume and Dosimetry in Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Physics-based data augmentation for improved training of cone-beam computed tomography auto-segmentation of the female pelvis.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Modeling dosimetric benefits from daily adaptive RT for gynecological cancer patients with and without knowledge-based dose prediction.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Dosimetric effects of bladder volume changes in MR-guided radiotherapy for cervical cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Evaluating CBCT-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer Using Synthetic CBCT Data.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Daily online adaptation enhances target coverage in prostate cancer radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvaluate a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based daily adaptive platform in cervical cancer for multiple endpoints: (1) physics contouring accuracy of daily CTVs, (2) CTV coverage with adapted plans and reduced PTV margins versus non-adapted plans with standard-of-care (SOC) margins, (3) dosimetric improvements to CTV and organs-at-risk (OARs), and (4) on-couch time. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using a Varian Ethos™ emulator and KV-CBCT scans, we simulated the doses 15 retrospective cervical cancer patients would have received with/without online adaptation for five fractions. We compared contours and doses from SOC plans (5-15 mm CTV-to-PTV margins) to adapted plans (3 mm margins). Auto-segmented CTVs and OARs were reviewed and edited by trained physicists. Physics-edited targets were evaluated by an oncologist. Time spent reviewing and editing auto-segmented structures was recorded. Metrics from the CTV (D99%), bowel (V45Gy, V40Gy), bladder (D50%), and rectum (D50%) were compared.
resultsThe physician approved the physics-edited CTVs for 55/75 fractions; 16/75 required reductions, and 4/75 required CTV expansions. CTVs were encapsulated by unadapted, SOC PTVs for 56/75 (72%) fractions-representative of current clinical practice. CTVs were completely covered by adapted 3 mm PTVs for 71/75 (94.6%) fractions. CTV D99% values for adapted plans were comparable to non-adapted SOC plans (average difference of -0.9%), while all OAR metrics improved with adaptation. Specifically, bowel V45Gy and V40Gy decreased on average by 87.6 and 109.4 cc, while bladder and rectum D50% decreased by 37.7% and 35.8%, respectively. The time required for contouring and calculating an adaptive plan for 65/75 fractions was less than 20 min (range: 1-29 min).
conclusionsImproved dose metrics with daily adaption could translate to reduced toxicity while maintaining tumor control. Training physicists to perform contouring edits could minimize the time physicians are required at adaptive sessions improving clinical efficiency. All emulated adaptive sessions were completed within 30 min however extra time will be required for patient setup, image acquisition, and treatment delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.