Observational studyClinical cardiology2023
Preliminary results from the LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX-Dx PERFORM) study.
Observational study in Clinical cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Prioritizing Discovery and Advancements in Arrhythmia Therapies: NIH/NHLBI Workshop.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2026Review
- Safety, performance, and remote programming utilization of an insertable cardiac monitor: The LUX-Dx PERFORM study.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Real-world use of insertable cardiac monitor remote programming: A multicenter European experience.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Invasive and Non-Invasive Remote Patient Monitoring Devices for Heart Failure: A Comparative Review of Technical Maturity and Clinical Readiness.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Subcutaneous sensors for monitoring congestion and to reduce heart failure hospitalizations-a viable middle ground between deep implantable intravascular monitoring devices and wearable technologies?Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- From Wristbands to Implants: The Transformative Role of Wearables in Heart Failure Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Implantation of a novel insertable cardiac monitor: preliminary multicenter experience in Europe.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024Review
- Monitoring of Remotely Reprogrammable Implantable Loop Recorders With Algorithms to Reduce False-Positive Alerts.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis.Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2023Article
- Preliminary results from the LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX-Dx PERFORM) study.Clinical cardiology · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the wide adoption of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), high false-positive rates, suboptimal signal quality, limited ability to detect atrial flutter, and lack of remote programming remain challenging. The LUX-Dx PERFORM study was designed to evaluate novel technologies engineered to address these issues. Here, we present preliminary results from the trial focusing on the safety of ICM insertion, remote monitoring rates, and the feasibility of remote programming. LUX-Dx PERFORM is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, post-market, observational study with planned enrollment of up to 827 patients from 35 sites in North America. A preliminary cohort consisting of the first 369 patients who were enrolled between March and October 2021 was selected for analysis. Three hundred sixty-three (363) patients had ICM insertions across inpatient and outpatient settings. The mean time followed was 103.4 ± 61.8 days per patient. The total infection rate was 0.8% (3/363). Interim results show high levels of remote monitoring with a median 94% of days with data transmission (interquartile range: 82-99). Thirteen (13) in-clinic and 24 remote programming sessions were reported in 34 subjects. Reprogramming examples are presented to highlight signal quality, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the positive impact of remote programming on patient management. Interim results from LUX-Dx PERFORM study demonstrate the safety of insertion, high data transmission rates, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the feasibility of remote programming to optimize arrhythmia detection and improve clinical workflow. Future results from LUX-Dx PERFORM will further characterize improvements in signal quality and arrhythmia detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.