Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36208096›Full record

Observational studyClinical cardiology2023

Preliminary results from the LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX-Dx PERFORM) study.

Craig Stolen, Jonathan Rosman, Harish Manyam, Brian Kwan, Jonathan Kelly, David Perschbacher, John Garner, Mark Richards

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Implantation of a novel insertable cardiac monitor: preliminary multicenter experience in Europe.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Craig StolenCardiac Rythm Management, Boston Scientific, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5725-463X
Jonathan RosmanCardiac Arrhythmia Service, Florida Atlantic University CESCOM, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Harish ManyamDepartment of Cardiology, Erlanger Hospital, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Brian KwanCardiac Rythm Management, Boston Scientific, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Jonathan KellyCardiac Rythm Management, Boston Scientific, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.
David PerschbacherCardiac Rythm Management, Boston Scientific, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.
John GarnerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Mark RichardsYakima Heart Lung & Vascular Clinic, Yakima Valley Memorial, Yakima, Washington, USA.
Boston Scientific (United States) · USErlanger Health System · USFlorida Atlantic University · USUniversity of Missouri · USVirginia Mason Memorial · US

Funding

Boston Scientific Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the wide adoption of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), high false-positive rates, suboptimal signal quality, limited ability to detect atrial flutter, and lack of remote programming remain challenging. The LUX-Dx PERFORM study was designed to evaluate novel technologies engineered to address these issues. Here, we present preliminary results from the trial focusing on the safety of ICM insertion, remote monitoring rates, and the feasibility of remote programming. LUX-Dx PERFORM is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, post-market, observational study with planned enrollment of up to 827 patients from 35 sites in North America. A preliminary cohort consisting of the first 369 patients who were enrolled between March and October 2021 was selected for analysis. Three hundred sixty-three (363) patients had ICM insertions across inpatient and outpatient settings. The mean time followed was 103.4 ± 61.8 days per patient. The total infection rate was 0.8% (3/363). Interim results show high levels of remote monitoring with a median 94% of days with data transmission (interquartile range: 82-99). Thirteen (13) in-clinic and 24 remote programming sessions were reported in 34 subjects. Reprogramming examples are presented to highlight signal quality, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the positive impact of remote programming on patient management. Interim results from LUX-Dx PERFORM study demonstrate the safety of insertion, high data transmission rates, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the feasibility of remote programming to optimize arrhythmia detection and improve clinical workflow. Future results from LUX-Dx PERFORM will further characterize improvements in signal quality and arrhythmia detection.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAtrial FlutterElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryHumansOutpatientsProspective Studiesarrhythmiacryptogenic strokedevice programmingICMremote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36208096
PMCPMC9849434
OpenAlexW4303644901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.