Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207820›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2022

Detecting zoonotic and non-zoonotic pathogens in livestock and their ticks in Corsican wetlands.

Baptiste Defaye, Sara Moutailler, Sébastien Grech-Angelini, Clémence Galon, Sandrine Ferrandi, Vanina Pasqualini, Yann Quilichini

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular detection ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Baptiste DefayeUMR CNRS SPE 6134 - Université de Corse Pascal Paoli, Corte, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5252-8574
Sara MoutaillerANSES, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, UMR BIPAR, Laboratoire de Santé Animale, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Sébastien Grech-AngeliniGroupement Technique Vétérinaire de Corse, Corte, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4133-6726
Clémence GalonANSES, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, UMR BIPAR, Laboratoire de Santé Animale, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Sandrine FerrandiGroupement Technique Vétérinaire de Corse, Corte, France.
Vanina PasqualiniUMR CNRS SPE 6134 - Université de Corse Pascal Paoli, Corte, France.
Yann QuilichiniUMR CNRS SPE 6134 - Université de Corse Pascal Paoli, Corte, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRUniversité de Corse Pascal Paoli · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorsica is a large French island in the Mediterranean Sea with high human and animal migration rates, especially near wetlands where these migrations are particularly frequent. Among the livestock populations, cattle and sheep are widely present all across the entire Mediterranean region. Trade can be responsible for the circulation of numerous pathogens and their vectors, thereby representing a health and economic threat for the livestock industry.

objectivesThe objective of our study was to investigate the presence of pathogens in cattle and sheep farms in the wetlands of Corsica using a high-throughput screening technique.

methodsIn our study, blood samples and ticks were collected from cattle and sheep in 20 municipalities near Corsican wetlands to screen for the presence of various types of pathogens. The samples were processed using a high-throughput screening technique based on real-time microfluidic PCR: 45 pathogens were screened in 47 samples simultaneously.

resultsA total of 372 cattle and 74 sheep were sampled, and 444 ticks were collected from cattle. Out of the eight tick species detected, the main one was Rhipicephalus bursa (38.7% of the ticks collected). From cattle blood samples, one species and two genera were found: Anaplasma marginale, Trypanosoma sp. and Babesia sp. in respectively 61.5%, 58.3% and 12.2% of the cattle blood samples. From sheep blood samples, 74.3% were positive for Anaplasma sp, 2.7% for Anaplasma ovis and 1.4% for Anaplasma capra. This is the first report of A. ovis DNA in blood samples from sheep in Corsica. Out of 444 the tick samples, 114 were positive: 77.2% for Rickettsia aeschlimannii, 20.2% for Rickettsia sp., 3.5% for Babesia sp. and 1.8% for Anaplasma sp. Among them, 2.7% were co-infected with R. aeschlimannii and Babesia sp.

conclusionsOur results confirm the extent of possible circulation of different pathogens near Corsican wetlands, not only in ticks collected from livestock but also directly in cattle and sheep, with two (Trypanosoma sp. and Babesia sp.) being detected for the first time in cattle, one for the first time in sheep (A. ovis) and one for the first time in Corsica (A. capra).

Indexed as

BabesiaCattle DiseasesTick-Borne DiseasesTicksAnimalsCattleHumansLivestockSheepWetlandsAnaplasmaBabesiacattlehigh-throughput screening techniqueRickettsiasheeptick-borne pathogenstickstrypanosomawetlands

Identifiers

PMID36207820
PMCPMC9677362
OpenAlexW4303685191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.