Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207772›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022

Comparison of preprocessing techniques to reduce nontissue-related variations in hyperspectral reflectance imaging.

Mark Witteveen, Hendricus J C M Sterenborg, Ton G van Leeuwen, Maurice C G Aalders, Theo J M Ruers, Anouk L Post

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark Witteveenthe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Netherlands.
Hendricus J C M Sterenborgthe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Netherlands.
Ton G van LeeuwenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Netherlands.
Maurice C G AaldersAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Netherlands.
Theo J M Ruersthe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Netherlands.
Anouk L Postthe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Hyperspectral reflectance imaging can be used in medicine to identify tissue types, such as tumor tissue. Tissue classification algorithms are developed based on, e.g., machine learning or principle component analysis. For the development of these algorithms, data are generally preprocessed to remove variability in data not related to the tissue itself since this will improve the performance of the classification algorithm. In hyperspectral imaging, the measured spectra are also influenced by reflections from the surface (glare) and height variations within and between tissue samples. Aim: To compare the ability of different preprocessing algorithms to decrease variations in spectra induced by glare and height differences while maintaining contrast based on differences in optical properties between tissue types. Approach: We compare eight preprocessing algorithms commonly used in medical hyperspectral imaging: standard normal variate, multiplicative scatter correction, min-max normalization, mean centering, area under the curve normalization, single wavelength normalization, first derivative, and second derivative. We investigate conservation of contrast stemming from differences in: blood volume fraction, presence of different absorbers, scatter amplitude, and scatter slope-while correcting for glare and height variations. We use a similarity metric, the overlap coefficient, to quantify contrast between spectra. We also investigate the algorithms for clinical datasets from the colon and breast. Conclusions: Preprocessing reduces the overlap due to glare and distance variations. In general, the algorithms standard normal variate, min-max, area under the curve, and single wavelength normalization are the most suitable to preprocess data used to develop a classification algorithm for tissue classification. The type of contrast between tissue types determines which of these four algorithms is most suitable.

Indexed as

Hyperspectral ImagingSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsPrincipal Component AnalysisSpectroscopy, Near-Infraredcancerclassificationglarehyperspectralmachine learningnormalizationpreprocessingscatter correction

Identifiers

PMID36207772
PMCPMC9541333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.