ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022
Comparison of preprocessing techniques to reduce nontissue-related variations in hyperspectral reflectance imaging.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portable Multispectral Optoelectronic System for Thyroid Cancer Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perspective on the current state of hyperspectral/multispectral imaging for minimally invasive surgery.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
- Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for enhanced diagnostic precision in breast cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Hyperspectral-based classification of individual wheat plants into fine-scale reproductive stages.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Exploring Generative Artificial Intelligence and Data Augmentation Techniques for Spectroscopy Analysis.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Crop Chlorophyll Mapping Using Remote Sensing Approaches: Achievements, Limitations, and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Toward real-time margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery with hyperspectral imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The influence of different factors on the bond strength of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass-ceramics to Resin: a machine learning analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluating Normalization Methods for Robust Spectral Performance Assessments of Hyperspectral Imaging Cameras.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Advanced hyperspectral image processing and machine learning approaches for early detection of wheat stem rust.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Diffuse Reflection Spectroscopy for Intraoperative Margin Assessment During Prostatectomy.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Separating Surface Reflectance from Volume Reflectance in Medical Hyperspectral Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Toward the use of diffuse reflection spectroscopy for intra-operative tissue discrimination during sarcoma surgery.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- A data fusion approach for nondestructive tracking of the ripening process and quality attributes of green Hayward kiwifruit using artificial olfaction and proximal hyperspectral imaging techniques.Food science & nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Hyperspectral reflectance imaging can be used in medicine to identify tissue types, such as tumor tissue. Tissue classification algorithms are developed based on, e.g., machine learning or principle component analysis. For the development of these algorithms, data are generally preprocessed to remove variability in data not related to the tissue itself since this will improve the performance of the classification algorithm. In hyperspectral imaging, the measured spectra are also influenced by reflections from the surface (glare) and height variations within and between tissue samples. Aim: To compare the ability of different preprocessing algorithms to decrease variations in spectra induced by glare and height differences while maintaining contrast based on differences in optical properties between tissue types. Approach: We compare eight preprocessing algorithms commonly used in medical hyperspectral imaging: standard normal variate, multiplicative scatter correction, min-max normalization, mean centering, area under the curve normalization, single wavelength normalization, first derivative, and second derivative. We investigate conservation of contrast stemming from differences in: blood volume fraction, presence of different absorbers, scatter amplitude, and scatter slope-while correcting for glare and height variations. We use a similarity metric, the overlap coefficient, to quantify contrast between spectra. We also investigate the algorithms for clinical datasets from the colon and breast. Conclusions: Preprocessing reduces the overlap due to glare and distance variations. In general, the algorithms standard normal variate, min-max, area under the curve, and single wavelength normalization are the most suitable to preprocess data used to develop a classification algorithm for tissue classification. The type of contrast between tissue types determines which of these four algorithms is most suitable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.