Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207744›Full record

ArticleLipids in health and disease2022

Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population.

Song Lu, Maobin Kuang, Jinjing Yue, Chong Hu, Guotai Sheng, Yang Zou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Intestinal helminthFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Song Lu *Medical College of Nanchang University, 330006, Nanchang, Jiangxi Provincial, China.
Maobin Kuang *Medical College of Nanchang University, 330006, Nanchang, Jiangxi Provincial, China.
Jinjing Yue *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 450052, Zhengzhou, Henan Provincial, China.
Chong HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, 330006, Nanchang, Jiangxi Provincial, China.
Guotai ShengJiangxi Cardiovascular Research Institute, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, 330006, Nanchang, Jiangxi Provincial, China.
Yang ZouJiangxi Cardiovascular Research Institute, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, 330006, Nanchang, Jiangxi Provincial, China. jxyxyzy@163.com.
Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital · CNNanchang University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional and non-traditional (TNNT) lipid indicators are known to be closely related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study's objective was to compare the degree of associations and diagnostic values of TNNT lipid indicators with NAFLD.

methodsParticipants were 14,251 Japanese adults who undergoing health checkups, and we measured and calculated 11 lipid indicators, including traditional lipid indicators such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride (TG), as well as non-traditional lipid indicators such as TC/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, TG/HDL-C ratio, non-HDL-C, remnant cholesterol (RC), RC/HDL-C ratio and non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio. The associations between these lipid indicators and NAFLD were assessed using multivariate logistic regression, and the performance of these lipid indicators in identifying NAFLD was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

resultsAfter rigorous adjustment for potential confounders, multivariate logistic regression showed that all TNNT lipid indicators were independently associated with NAFLD, among which the RC/HDL-C ratio and RC had the strongest association with NAFLD. ROC analysis showed that non-traditional lipid indicators were superior to traditional lipid indicators in identifying NAFLD, especially in young adults and females. It is worth mentioning that the RC/HDL-C ratio was the best lipid indicator for identifying NAFLD with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 and an optimal cut-off value of 0.43; in addition, TG/HDL-C ratio also had a high recognition performance for NAFLD.

conclusionOverall, in the Japanese population, non-traditional lipid indicators had a higher diagnostic value for NAFLD compared to traditional lipid indicators, and lipid indicators alone had a lower diagnostic value for NAFLD than the ratio of two lipid indicators, with RC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C being the best lipid indicators for identifying NAFLD.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseBiomarkersCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLFemaleHumansJapanTriglyceridesYoung AdultBiomarkersCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLTriglyceridesNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseNon-traditional lipid indicatorsRC/HDL-C ratioTG/HDL-C ratio

Identifiers

PMID36207744
PMCPMC9540727
OpenAlexW4303045035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.