Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207660›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2023

Routine preoperative MRCP in screening choledocholithiasis in acute cholecystitis compared to selective approach: a population-based study.

Anne Mattila, Emilia Pynnönen, Antti Sironen, Eeva Elomaa, Johanna Mrena, Aapo Jalkanen, Mika Nevalainen, Olli Helminen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne MattilaDept. of Surgery, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Hoitajantie 3, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland. anne.mattila@ksshp.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-1765
Emilia PynnönenDept. of Radiology, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Antti SironenDept. of Radiology, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Eeva ElomaaDept. of Radiology, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Johanna MrenaDept. of Surgery, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Hoitajantie 3, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Aapo JalkanenDept. of Surgery, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Hoitajantie 3, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Mika NevalainenMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Olli HelminenDept. of Surgery, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Hoitajantie 3, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Central Finland Health Care District · FIOulu University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choledocholithiasis is more common in acute cholecystitis than in elective situations. Preoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is essential to facilitate adequate planning of CBD (common bile duct) stone removal, preferably performed as a single-stage procedure. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of routine preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in acute cholecystitis followed by consequent cholecystectomy. A total of 180 consecutive patients operated for acute cholecystitis between January 2019 and December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative routine MRCP was performed for bile duct evaluation when feasible. The control cohort consisted of 180 consecutive patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy before the study period. Intraoperative cholangiography was used routinely in both groups when technically achievable. We examined the proportion of patients recruited in preoperative MRCP, possible time delay to MRCP and surgery, and the incidence of CBD stones compared to the control cohort. Routine MRCP in acute cholecystitis was achieved in 114/180 (63%) patients compared to 42/180 (23.3%) patients of the control group. The triage time from emergency to MRCP and the operating theatre was similar in both cohorts. The percentage of patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis in the study group was notably higher (almost 18% vs 11%), p < 0.05. After a median follow-up time of 2.5 years in the study group and almost 4 years in the control group, recurrent choledocholithiasis was not detected in either group. Routine MRCP in patients with acute cholecystitis can be implemented with a fair execution rate in a population-based setting with minor effects on hospital stay and delays but higher detection of choledocholithiasis. We observed no additional benefit compared to the selective use of MRCP. However, routine preoperative MRCP allows an advantage when considering the appropriate exploration method if choledocholithiasis is detected.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteCholedocholithiasisGallstonesCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceHumansRetrospective StudiesAcute cholecystitisCholecystectomyCholedocholithiasisEmergency radiologyMRCP

Identifiers

PMID36207660
OpenAlexW4303453574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.