Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207646›Full record

ReviewTopics in current chemistry (Cham)2022

In Situ TEM under Optical Excitation for Catalysis Research.

Shima Kadkhodazadeh, Filippo C Cavalca, Ben J Miller, Liuxian Zhang, Jakob B Wagner, Peter A Crozier, Thomas W Hansen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Topics in current chemistry (Cham), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Recent advances iniScience · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shima KadkhodazadehDTU Nanolab, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Filippo C CavalcaDTU Nanolab, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Ben J MillerSchool for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Liuxian ZhangSchool for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Jakob B WagnerDTU Nanolab, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Peter A CrozierSchool for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Thomas W HansenDTU Nanolab, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. thwh@dtu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-3054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In situ characterization of materials in their operational state is a highly active field of research. Investigating the structure and response of materials under stimuli that simulate real working environments for technological applications can provide new insight and unique input to the synthesis and design of novel materials. Over recent decades, experimental setups that allow different stimuli to be applied to a sample inside an electron microscope have been devised, built, and commercialized. In this review, we focus on the in situ investigation of optically active materials using transmission electron microscopy. We illustrate two different approaches for exposing samples to light inside the microscope column, explaining the importance of different aspects of their mechanical construction and choice of light source and materials. We focus on the technical challenges of the setups and provide details of the construction, providing the reader with input on deciding which setup will be more useful for a specific experiment. The use of these setups is illustrated using examples from the literature of relevance to photocatalysis and nanoparticle synthesis.

Indexed as

CatalysisMicroscopy, Electron, Transmission

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.