ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2022
Leveraging the Exploratory and Predictive Capabilities of Design of Experiments in Development of Intraarticular Injection of Imatinib Mesylate Containing Lipospheres.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An intraarticular, liposphere-based, formulation of Imatinib mesylate for weekly administration was developed. Lipospheres were prepared using double emulsion technique using dierucoyl phosphatidylcholine, 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-rac-(1-glycerol) sodium salt), cholesterol, and tricaprylin as lipid phase in dichloromethane in a four-step process. Primary emulsion, formed using a high-pressure homogenizer, was diluted using a secondary aqueous phase in an Inline mixer to form the liposomal dispersion. Nitrogen flushing was done to remove dichloromethane, and the dispersion was finally centrifuged and adjusted for potency. The amount of cholesterol and triglyceride was taken as formulation variables, and speed of homogenization was used as a process variable in the Box-Behnken design while particle size, % drug entrapment, and drug release at the end of 4 h and 5 days were taken as response variables. Multivariate data analysis grouped the variables in two latent variable sets, one based on the speed and the other on the composition of lipospheres. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to generate mathematical model for each response. Constraints were put on the values of responses, as per the requirements of the final product, and the "freedom to operate" design space was located using an overlay plot. The center point batch sufficed all the set criteria, and Monte Carlo simulations on the factor variables indicated a defect rate of 5%. The center point batch was characterized for viscosity, osmolality, pH, drug release, and lipocrit value. The dispersion was charged in a prefilled syringe and studied for stability. The product was found to be stable at 2-8°C over a period of 6 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36207604What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.