ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2022
Effect of radioactivity outside the field of view on image quality of dedicated breast positron emission tomography: preliminary phantom and clinical studies.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of image quality of breast-specific positron emission tomography between opposite-type and ring-shaped systems: insights from Phantom and clinical studies in a Japanese multicenter trial.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning model with collage images for the segmentation of dedicated breast positron emission tomography images.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Impact ofEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Can the Newer Model of Breast-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Reduce the "Blind Area"?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Organ-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Scanners for Breast Imaging: Comparison between the Performances of Prior and Novel Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Proposal to Improve the Image Quality of Short-Acquisition Time-Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography Using the Pix2pix Generative Adversarial Network.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSemi-quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) values, such as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV
methodsA breast phantom containing the left myocardium, which was prepared using a 3D printer, filled with
resultsThe phantom study showed that the higher the RCR of the myocardium and the closer it is to the top edge of the phantom, the higher is the pixel value of the dbPET images. In a clinical study, LUR was significantly correlated with myocardial SUV
conclusionsFDG uptake in the myocardium affected dbPET images of the left breast, especially near the chest wall. Further, the effect of RI outside the FOV, such as in the myocardium, must be considered in the quantitative evaluation of breast cancer using dbPET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.