Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207428›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Description of electroencephalographic data gathered using water-based medium-expansion foam as a depopulation method for nursery pigs.

Jack Korenyi-Both, Jorge Vidaurre, Tim Held, Magnus R Campler, Justin Kieffer, Ting-Yu Cheng, Steven J Moeller, Andrew S Bowman, Andréia G Arruda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Technical note: Construction of a COTranslational animal science · 2025
    Article
  5. The use of high expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jack Korenyi-BothDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.
Jorge VidaurrePediatric Neurology Department, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Tim HeldPediatric Neurology Department, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Magnus R CamplerDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.
Justin KiefferDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.
Ting-Yu ChengDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.
Steven J MoellerDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.
Andrew S BowmanDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.
Andréia G ArrudaDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA. arruda.13@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · USNationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States' swine industry is under constant threat of foreign animal diseases, which may emerge without warning due to the globalized transportation networks moving people, animals, and products. Therefore, having disease control and elimination protocols in place prior to pathogen introduction is paramount for business continuity and economic recovery. During extraordinary circumstances, it may become necessary to depopulate large populations of animals, including swine, as a disease containment measure. Currently approved depopulation methods for swine present significant logistical challenges when scaled to large populations or performed in field conditions. In the United States, water-based foam is currently approved for poultry depopulation, and recent field studies demonstrate water-based foam is an effective depopulation alternative for swine. While effective, the speed at which water-based foam induces loss of consciousness prior to death, a major welfare consideration, has not been adequately investigated. In this study, 12 nursery pigs were terminated using water-based medium-expansion foam to quantify the time to induce loss of consciousness and ultimately brain death. Each pig was implanted with subdermal electrodes to capture electroencephalographic data, placed in a body sling, and suspended in a plastic bulk container that was subsequently filled with water-based foam. Electroencephalographic data was recorded for 15 min, during which the pigs remained immersed in the water-based foam. Conservatively, average (± SD) time to unconsciousness and brain death was 1 min, 53 s ± 36 s and 3 min, 3 s ± 56 s, respectively. The relatively rapid loss of consciousness compared to other methods limits the amount of distress and is overall a positive finding for the welfare of the pigs that might be depopulated with water-based foam. The findings of this study add additional evidence supporting the use of water-based medium-expansion foam for an emergency depopulation of swine.

Indexed as

Euthanasia, AnimalWaterAnimalsBrain DeathHumansPlasticsSwineUnconsciousnessUnited StatesPlasticsWater

Identifiers

PMID36207428
PMCPMC9546833
OpenAlexW4303415600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.