Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207422›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

3D measurement techniques for the hindfoot alignment angle from weight-bearing CT in a clinical population.

Chiara Pavani, Claudio Belvedere, Maurizio Ortolani, Mauro Girolami, Stefano Durante, Lisa Berti, Alberto Leardini

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06193057 (Comparison of Customized and Standard Total Ankle Prostheses), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06193057 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Customized and Standard Total Ankle Prostheses: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2023 to 2027Enrolled24ConditionsAnkle OsteoarthritisArmsTotal ankle arthroplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. 3D foot and ankle radiographic measurement toolbox.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chiara PavaniMovement Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, Italy.
Claudio BelvedereMovement Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, Italy. belvedere@ior.it.
Maurizio OrtolaniMovement Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, Italy.
Mauro GirolamiBentivoglio Orthopaedic Ward, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano DuranteManagement of Health Professions IRCCS S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Lisa BertiMovement Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, Italy.
Alberto LeardiniMovement Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans now enable accurate measurements on foot skeletal structures with the advantage of observing these in 3D and in weight-bearing. Among the most common skeletal deformities, the varus/valgus of the hindfoot is the most complex to be represented, and a number of measure proposals have been published. This study aims to analyze and to compare these measurements from CBCT scans in a real clinical population with large such deformity. Ten patients with severe acquired adult flatfoot and indication for surgery underwent CBCT scans (Carestream, USA) while standing on that leg, before and after surgical correction. Corresponding 3D shape of each bone of the distal shank and hindfoot were defined (Materialise, Belgium). Six different techniques from the literature were used to calculate the varus/valgus deformity, i.e. the inclination of the hindfoot in the frontal plane of the shank. Standard clinical measurements by goniometers were taken for comparison. According to these techniques, and starting from a careful 3D reconstruction of the relevant foot skeletal structures, a large spectrum of measurements was found to represent the same hindfoot alignment angle. Most of them were very different from the traditional clinical measures. The assessment of the pre-operative valgus deformity and of the corresponding post-operative correction varied considerably. CBCT finally allows 3D assessment of foot deformities in weight-bearing. Measurements from the different available techniques do not compare well, as they are based on very different approaches. It is recommended to be aware of the anatomical and functional concepts behind these techniques before clinical and surgical conclusions.

Indexed as

FlatfootFoot DeformitiesAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFootHumansWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID36207422
PMCPMC9546907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.