Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207362›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

An assessment tool for computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) algorithms.

Ji-Won Choi, Ludvik Alkhoury, Leonardo F Urbano, Puneet Masson, Matthew VerMilyea, Moshe Kam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Defining Puberty and Spectrum of Hypogonadism in Alström Syndrome.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. In vitro models of the male reproductive system: applications for developmental and reproductive toxicology.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. GYNs at the REI gates: unsolvable conundrum or unambiguous opportunity?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  12. [Application of Artificial Intelligence in Sperm Quality Analysis and Sperm Screening].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ji-Won ChoiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Ludvik AlkhouryDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Leonardo F UrbanoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Puneet MassonPenn Fertility Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Matthew VerMilyeaOvation Fertility, Brentwood, TN, 37027, USA.
Moshe KamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. Kam@njit.edu.
New Jersey Institute of Technology · USDrexel University · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USOvation Fertility · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA) enables reliable analysis of semen images, and is designed to process large number of images with high consistency, accuracy, and repeatability. Design and testing of CASA algorithms can be accelerated greatly if reliable simulations of semen images under a variety of conditions and sample quality modes are available. Using life-like simulation of semen images can quantify the performance of existing and proposed CASA algorithms, since the parameters of the simulated image are known and controllable. We present simulation models for sperm cell image and swimming modes observed in real 2D (top-down) images of sperm cells in laboratory specimen. The models simulate human sperm using four (4) types of swimming, namely linear mean, circular, hyperactive, and immotile (or dead). The simulation models are used in studying algorithms for segmentation, localization, and tracking of sperm cells. Several segmentation and localization algorithms were tested under varying levels of noise, and then compared using precision, recall, and the optimal subpattern assignment (OSPA) metric. Images of real human semen sample were used to validate the segmentation and localization observations obtained from simulations. An example is given of sperm cell tracking on simulated semen images of cells using the different tracking algorithms (nearest neighbor (NN), global nearest neighbor (GNN), probabilistic data association filter (PDAF), and joint probabilistic data association filter (JPDAF)). Tracking performance was evaluated through multi-object tracking precision (MOTP) and multi-object tracking accuracy (MOTA). Simulation models enable objective assessments of semen image processing algorithms. We demonstrate the use of a new simulation tool to assess and compare segmentation, localization, and tracking methods. The simulation software allows testing along a large spectrum of parameter values that control the appearance and behavior of simulated semen images. Users can generate scenarios of different characteristics and assess the effectiveness of different CASA algorithms in these environments. The simulation was used to assess and compare algorithms for segmentation and tracking of sperm cells in semen images.

Indexed as

SemenSemen AnalysisAlgorithmsComputersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleSpermatozoaSperm Motility

Identifiers

PMID36207362
PMCPMC9546881
OpenAlexW4303413593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.