Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207355›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Study on the interaction preference between CYCD subclass and CDK family members at the poplar genome level.

Chengcheng He, Jinghui Liang, Zhaoqun Wu, Xianglin Zhuge, Nan Xu, Hailing Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chengcheng He *National Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Institute of Tree Development and Genome Editing, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Jinghui Liang *National Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Institute of Tree Development and Genome Editing, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Zhaoqun WuNational Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Institute of Tree Development and Genome Editing, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Xianglin ZhugeNational Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Institute of Tree Development and Genome Editing, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Nan XuNational Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Institute of Tree Development and Genome Editing, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Hailing YangNational Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Institute of Tree Development and Genome Editing, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China. yhailing77@163.com.
Beijing Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) control the progression of the cell cycle. D-type cyclin (CYCD) is generally believed to form a complex with CDK and control the G1/S transition. In plants, CYCD and CDK gene families can be divided into 6 (D1-D7) and 7 (CDKA-CDKG) subclasses, respectively. Different subclasses in the CYCD and CDK families have different numbers, structures and functions. In some heterologous woody plants, the functions of these subclass family members remain unclear. In this study, 43 CYCD and 27 CDK gene family members were identified in the allodiploid Populus tomentosa Carr. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that these CYCDs and CDKs were divided into 6 and 7 subclasses, respectively, which were the same as other species. The analysis of protein properties, gene structure, motifs, domains, cis-acting elements and tissue-specific expression of all members of these CYCDs and CDKs showed that the differences between members of different subclasses varied widely, but members of the same subclass especially in the CDK gene family were very similar. These findings also demonstrated a strong correlation between CYCD and CDK gene family members in response to hormones and specific expression. The collinear analysis of P. tomentosa, Populus trichocarpa and Arabidopsis thaliana showed that the expansion patterns of CYCD and CDK gene families were predominantly whole genome duplications (WGD). The protein interaction prediction results of different subclasses of CYCD and CDKs showed that the interaction between different subclasses of CYCD and CDKs was significantly different. Our previous study found that transgenic PtoCYCD2;1 and PtoCYCD3;3 poplars exhibited opposite phenotypes. Y2H and BIFC results showed that the interaction between PtoCYCD2;1 and PtoCYCD3;3 was significantly different with CDKs. This finding might suggest that the functional differences of different CYCD subclasses in plant growth and development were closely related to the different interactions between CYCD and CDK. Our results provide a good idea and direction for the functional study of CYCD and CDK proteins in woody plants.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisPopulusCyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclinsHormonesPhylogenyPlantsCyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclinsHormones

Identifiers

PMID36207355
PMCPMC9547009
OpenAlexW4303415619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.