Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207329›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

High-precision electron affinity of oxygen.

Moa K Kristiansson, Kiattichart Chartkunchand, Gustav Eklund, Odd M Hole, Emma K Anderson, Nathalie de Ruette, Magdalena Kamińska, Najeeb Punnakayathil, José E Navarro-Navarrete, Stefan Sigurdsson and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The OpenMolcasJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Moa K KristianssonDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. moa.kristiansson@fysik.su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8985-0516
Kiattichart ChartkunchandDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-4101
Gustav EklundDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9532-0637
Odd M HoleDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma K AndersonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nathalie de RuetteDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Magdalena KamińskaDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Najeeb PunnakayathilDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-598X
José E Navarro-NavarreteDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan SigurdssonDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jon GrumerTheoretical Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-3492
Ansgar SimonssonDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-0291
Mikael BjörkhageDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan RosénDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter ReinhedDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mikael BlomDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders KällbergDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
John D AlexanderDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik CederquistDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-0658
Henning ZettergrenDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2493-4161
Henning T SchmidtDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8209-5095
Dag HanstorpDepartment of Physics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stockholm University · SEAarhus University · DKStatistics Sweden · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2017-00621Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2021-00155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative ions are important in many areas of science and technology, e.g., in interstellar chemistry, for accelerator-based radionuclide dating, and in anti-matter research. They are unique quantum systems where electron-correlation effects govern their properties. Atomic anions are loosely bound systems, which with very few exceptions lack optically allowed transitions. This limits prospects for high-resolution spectroscopy, and related negative-ion detection methods. Here, we present a method to measure negative ion binding energies with an order of magnitude higher precision than what has been possible before. By laser-manipulation of quantum-state populations, we are able to strongly reduce the background from photodetachment of excited states using a cryogenic electrostatic ion-beam storage ring where keV ion beams can circulate for up to hours. The method is applicable to negative ions in general and here we report an electron affinity of 1.461 112 972(87) eV for

Identifiers

PMID36207329
PMCPMC9546871
OpenAlexW4303021929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.