Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207323›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Integrated analysis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma cohorts from three continents reveals conserved subtypes of prognostic significance.

Ankur Chakravarthy, Ian Reddin, Stephen Henderson, Cindy Dong, Nerissa Kirkwood, Maxmilan Jeyakumar, Daniela Rothschild Rodriguez, Natalia Gonzalez Martinez, Jacqueline McDermott, Xiaoping Su and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Ankur Chakravarthy *Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ian Reddin *Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5478-7855
Stephen HendersonUCL Cancer Institute, Bill Lyons Informatics Centre, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9032-3828
Cindy DongSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Nerissa KirkwoodSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Maxmilan JeyakumarSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Daniela Rothschild RodriguezSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0749-4889
Natalia Gonzalez MartinezSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1038-5306
Jacqueline McDermottUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Xiaoping SuMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Nagayasau EgawaDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Christina S FjeldboDepartment of Radiation Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Vilde Eide SkingenDepartment of Radiation Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1481-2355
Heidi LyngDepartment of Radiation Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7938-0514
Mari Kyllesø HalleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Camilla KrakstadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0174-8139
Afschin SoleimanINNPATH, Institute of Pathology, Tirol Kliniken Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Susanne SprungInstitute of Pathology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Matt LechnerUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7123-0773
Peter J I EllisSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9709-7934
Mark WassSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5428-6479
Martin MichaelisSchool of Biosciences, Division of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-5888
Heidi FieglDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1236-6806
Helga SalvesenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Gareth J ThomasCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-7335
John DoorbarDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Kerry ChesterUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK. k.chester@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3093-3130
Andrew FeberCentre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital Trust, London, UK. a.feber@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5282-0498
Tim R FentonCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. t.r.fenton@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4737-8233
University of Kent · GBCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBHaukeland University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NOInnsbruck Medical University · ATUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTirol Kliniken · ATUniversity College London · GBUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R009295/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V010271/1Cancer Research UK A25825Medical Research Council MR/M025411/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Here we present an integrated multi-omic analysis of 643 cervical squamous cell carcinomas (CSCC, the most common histological variant of cervical cancer), representing patient populations from the USA, Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa and identify two CSCC subtypes (C1 and C2) with differing prognosis. C1 and C2 tumours can be driven by either of the two most common HPV types in cervical cancer (16 and 18) and while HPV16 and HPV18 are overrepresented among C1 and C2 tumours respectively, the prognostic difference between groups is not due to HPV type. C2 tumours, which comprise approximately 20% of CSCCs across these cohorts, display distinct genomic alterations, including loss or mutation of the STK11 tumour suppressor gene, increased expression of several immune checkpoint genes and differences in the tumour immune microenvironment that may explain the shorter survival associated with this group. In conclusion, we identify two therapy-relevant CSCC subtypes that share the same defining characteristics across three geographically diverse cohorts.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansPapillomaviridaePrognosisTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36207323
PMCPMC9547055
OpenAlexW4303415615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.