Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207259›Full record

ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2023

Superiority and stigma in modern psychology and neuroscience.

Rebecca F Schwarzlose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ten simple rules for socially responsible science.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rebecca F SchwarzloseDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: schwarzlose@wustl.edu.

Funding

Training in the Genetics and Molecular Biology of Mental DisordersT32MH014677 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RICE, JOHN P. · 1985 to 2020
$3.6M
Neural mechanisms of sensory over-responsivity in children with and without ASDR00HD109454 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Rebecca Schwarzlose · 2024 to 2026
$747k
Neural mechanisms of sensory over-responsivity in children with and without ASDK99HD109454 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARZLOSE, REBECCA · 2022 to 2023
$263k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD109454NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD109454NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bias in early psychological and neuroscientific research distorted conclusions about women and people of color. Unintentional biases persisting today in studies of older adults and people with stigmatized conditions may perpetuate stigma and hinder scientific discovery. We can combat these biases by changing how we analyze, interpret, and describe differences.

Indexed as

NeurosciencesSocial StigmaAgedFemaleHumansagingbiasneurodevelopmental disorderspsychiatryresearch practicesstigma

Identifiers

PMID36207259
PMCPMC10367050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.