Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207136›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2023

Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study Comparing

Marianne Vogsen, Frederik Harbo, Nick M Jakobsen, Henriette J Nissen, Sara E Dahlsgaard-Wallenius, Oke Gerke, Jeanette D Jensen, Jon T Asmussen, Anne Marie B Jylling, Poul-Erik Braad and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06877949 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

FDG-PET/CT Versus Conventional CT for Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (MONITOR-RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2025 to 2029Enrolled420ConditionsMetastatic Breast Cancer, Response MonitoringArmsFDG-PET/CT, CE-CT
NCT07523516 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Performance of F18-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2029Enrolled97ConditionsBreast Cancer (Locally Advanced or Metastatic)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of PET imaging on triple negative breast cancer: an updated evidence-based perspective.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Prognostic value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cost-effectiveness of 2-[Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  17. 2-[Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marianne VogsenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; marianne.vogsen@rsyd.dk.
Frederik HarboDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Nick M JakobsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Henriette J NissenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sara E Dahlsgaard-WalleniusDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Oke GerkeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jeanette D JensenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jon T AsmussenDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anne Marie B JyllingDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Poul-Erik BraadDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Werner VachBasel Academy for Quality and Research in Medicine, Basel, Switzerland; and.
Marianne EwertzDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Malene G HildebrandtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKMusik Akademie Basel · CHUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) and

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansProspective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-FDG PET/CTCE-CTmetastatic breast cancerPERCISTresponse monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36207136
PMCPMC10071809
OpenAlexW4303475037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.