Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36207036›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Key learnings from an outcome and embedded process evaluation of a direct to beneficiary mobile health intervention among marginalised women in rural Bihar, India.

Laili Irani, Supriya Verma, Ruchika Mathur, Raj Kumar Verma, Diwakar Mohan, Diva Dhar, Aaditeshwar Seth, Indrajit Chaudhuri, Mahua Roy Chaudhury, Apolo Purthy and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Laili IraniPopulation Council, New York, New York, USA Laili.ir@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5472-507X
Supriya VermaPopulation Council, Delhi, India.
Ruchika MathurPopulation Council, Delhi, India.
Raj Kumar VermaPopulation Council, Delhi, India.
Diwakar MohanJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Diva DharBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Aaditeshwar SethGram Vaani, Delhi, India.
Indrajit ChaudhuriProject Concern International, San Diego, California, USA.
Mahua Roy ChaudhuryDepartment of Rural Development, Government of Bihar, JEEViKA, Bihar Rural Livelihoods Promotion Society, Patna, India.
Apolo PurthyDepartment of Rural Development, Government of Bihar, JEEViKA, Bihar Rural Livelihoods Promotion Society, Patna, India.
Ankit NandaPopulation Council, Delhi, India.
Shivani SinghPopulation Council, Delhi, India.
Akshay GuptaGram Vaani, Delhi, India.
Amnesty Elizabeth LeFevreUniversity of Cape Town, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-7240
Population Council Institute · INGates Foundation · USJohns Hopkins University · USPopulation Council · USProject Concern International · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMobile Vaani was implemented as a pilot programme across six blocks of Nalanda district in Bihar state, India to increase knowledge of rural women who were members of self-help groups on proper nutrition for pregnant or lactating mothers and infants, family planning and diarrhoea management. Conveners of self-help group meetings, community mobilisers, introduced women to the intervention by giving them access to interactive voice response informational and motivational content. A mixed methods outcome and embedded process evaluation was commissioned to assess the reach and impact of Mobile Vaani.

methodsThe outcome evaluation, conducted from January 2017 to November 2018, used a quasi-experimental pre-post design with a sample of 4800 married women aged 15-49 from self-help group households, who had a live birth in the past 24 months. Surveys with community mobilisers followed by meeting observations (n=116), in-depth interviews (n=180) with self-help group members and secondary analyses of system generated data were conducted to assess exposure and perceptions of the intervention.

resultsFrom the outcome evaluation, 23% of women interviewed had heard about Mobile Vaani. Women in the intervention arm had significantly higher knowledge than women in the comparison arm for two of seven focus outcomes: knowledge of how to make child's food nutrient and energy dense (treatment-on-treated: 18.8% (95% CI 0.4% to 37.2%, p<0.045)) and awareness of at least two modern spacing family planning methods (treatment-on-treated: 17.6% (95% CI 4.7% to 30.5%, p<0.008)). Women with any awareness of Mobile Vaani were happy with the programme and appreciated the ability to call in and listen to the content.

conclusionLow population awareness and programme exposure are underpinned by broader population level barriers to mobile phone access and use among women and missed opportunities by the programme to improve targeting and programme promotion. Further research is needed to assess programmatic linkages with changes in health practices.

Indexed as

LactationTelemedicineChildFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMothersPregnancyRural PopulationEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)Human resource managementNutrition

Identifiers

PMID36207036
PMCPMC9558784
OpenAlexW4303446423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.