Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36206976›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2022

Machine learning guided structure function predictions enable in silico nanoparticle screening for polymeric gene delivery.

Dennis Gong, Elana Ben-Akiva, Arshdeep Singh, Hannah Yamagata, Savannah Est-Witte, Julie K Shade, Natalia A Trayanova, Jordan J Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Smart micro/nanoneedles for gene delivery.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dennis GongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Elana Ben-AkivaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Arshdeep SinghDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Hannah YamagataDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Savannah Est-WitteDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Julie K ShadeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Natalia A TrayanovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Jordan J GreenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Institute for Nanobiotechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: green@jhu.edu.

Funding

TR&D Project 3P41EB028239 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JOEL CHAIM SUNSHINE · 2019 to 2026
$11.5M
Suprachoroidal nonviral gene transfer of engineered VEGF antagonistsR01EY031097 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPOCHIARO, PETER A, GREEN, JORDAN · 2020 to 2023
$2.4M
Gene Delivery Nanoparticles to Treat GlioblastomaR01CA228133 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, JORDAN · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Non-viral nucleic acid delivery to antigen presenting cells for cancer immunotherapyF31CA250367 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEN-AKIVA, ELANA · 2020 to 2021
$85k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA250367NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228133NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031097NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing highly efficient non-viral gene delivery reagents is still difficult for many hard-to-transfect cell types and, to date, has mostly been conducted via brute force screening routines. High throughput in silico methods of evaluating biomaterials can enable accelerated optimization and development of devices or therapeutics by exploring large chemical design spaces quickly and at low cost. This work reports application of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to a dataset of synthetic biodegradable polymers, poly(beta-amino ester)s (PBAEs), which have shown exciting promise for therapeutic gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. The data set includes polymer properties as inputs as well as polymeric nanoparticle transfection performance and nanoparticle toxicity in a range of cells as outputs. This data was used to train and evaluate several state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for their ability to predict transfection and understand structure-function relationships. By developing an encoding scheme for vectorizing the structure of a PBAE polymer in a machine-readable format, we demonstrate that a random forest model can satisfactorily predict DNA transfection in vitro based on the chemical structure of the constituent PBAE polymer in a cell line dependent manner. Based on the model, we synthesized PBAE polymers and used them to form polymeric gene delivery nanoparticles that were predicted in silico to be successful. We validated the computational predictions in two cell lines in vitro, RAW 264.7 macrophages and Hep3B liver cancer cells, and found that the Spearman's R correlation between predicted and experimental transfection was 0.57 and 0.66 respectively. Thus, a computational approach that encoded chemical descriptors of polymers was able to demonstrate that in silico computational screening of polymeric nanomedicine compositions had utility in predicting de novo biological experiments. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Developing highly efficient non-viral gene delivery reagents is difficult for many hard-to-transfect cell types and, to date, has mostly been explored via brute force screening routines. High throughput in silico methods of evaluating biomaterials can enable accelerated optimization and development for therapeutic or biomanufacturing purposes by exploring large chemical design spaces quickly and at low cost. This work reports application of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to a large compiled PBAE DNA gene delivery nanoparticle dataset across many cell types to develop predictive models for transfection and nanoparticle cytotoxicity. We develop a novel computational pipeline to encode PBAE nanoparticles with chemical descriptors and demonstrate utility in a de novo experimental context.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesPolymersBiocompatible MaterialsDNAMachine LearningTransfectionBiocompatible MaterialsDNAPolymersComputationalGene deliveryLibraryMachine learningNanoparticlePoly(beta-amino ester)Polymer

Identifiers

PMID36206976
PMCPMC11185862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.