Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36206484›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Chemical Society2022

Into the Unknown: How Computation Can Help Explore Uncharted Material Space.

Austin M Mroz, Victor Posligua, Andrew Tarzia, Emma H Wolpert, Kim E Jelfs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unbiased Structure Prediction of Sophisticated Cage Structures.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Unveiling Unusual Reactivity of SOInorganic chemistry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Chemical space as a unifying theme for chemistry.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Generative Models as an Emerging Paradigm in the Chemical Sciences.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Review
  18. Experimental Studies on TiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Austin M MrozDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, White City Campus, Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, U.K.
Victor PosliguaDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, White City Campus, Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3375-3706
Andrew TarziaDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, White City Campus, Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8797-8666
Emma H WolpertDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, White City Campus, Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-7975-7916
Kim E JelfsDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, White City Campus, Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-7683-7630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel functional materials are urgently needed to help combat the major global challenges facing humanity, such as climate change and resource scarcity. Yet, the traditional experimental materials discovery process is slow and the material space at our disposal is too vast to effectively explore using intuition-guided experimentation alone. Most experimental materials discovery programs necessarily focus on exploring the local space of known materials, so we are not fully exploiting the enormous potential material space, where more novel materials with unique properties may exist. Computation, facilitated by improvements in open-source software and databases, as well as computer hardware has the potential to significantly accelerate the rational development of materials, but all too often is only used to postrationalize experimental observations. Thus, the true predictive power of computation, where theory leads experimentation, is not fully utilized. Here, we discuss the challenges to successful implementation of computation-driven materials discovery workflows, and then focus on the progress of the field, with a particular emphasis on the challenges to reaching novel materials.

Indexed as

SoftwareTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36206484
PMCPMC9585593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.