Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36206400›Full record

Trial reportLupus2022

Safety of belimumab in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Results of a large integrated analysis of controlled clinical trial data.

Daniel J Wallace, Tatsuya Atsumi, Mark Daniels, Anne Hammer, Paige Meizlik, Holly Quasny, Andreas Schwarting, Fengchun Zhang, David A Roth

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lupus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. How to Cure Autoimmune GN and Podocytopathies.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lessons Learnt from the Belimumab Trials in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel J WallaceDivision of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Tatsuya Atsumi163693Department of Rheumatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Mark DanielsGlobal Medical Affairs, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Anne HammerBiostatistics, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Paige MeizlikGlobal Safety, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Holly QuasnyResearch and Development, GSK, Durham, NC, USA.
Andreas SchwartingDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, 22461University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Fengchun ZhangInternal Medicine Department, 34732Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
David A RothResearch and Development, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHokkaido University Hospital · JPUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, autoimmune disease that affects multiple organ systems. Belimumab, a targeted human monoclonal antibody, binds to and inhibits soluble B-lymphocyte stimulator. The safety and efficacy of belimumab has consistently been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials for the treatment of patients with active SLE. Integration of these data provides an additional opportunity to explore the safety of belimumab in a larger and more diverse population. This post hoc pooled analysis of clinical studies evaluated the safety profile of belimumab versus placebo in adults with SLE.

methodsThis was a pooled post hoc analysis of 52-week safety data from one Phase 2 and five Phase 3 belimumab trials in adult patients with SLE. Patients received ≥1 dose of placebo or belimumab (1, 4, or 10 mg/kg intravenous or 200 mg subcutaneous), plus standard therapy. Outcomes included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), severe AEs, AEs of special interest (AESI), and mortality.

resultsAcross 4170 patients (placebo: N = 1355; belimumab: N = 2815), baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment exposure were similar for placebo and belimumab. Most patients (placebo: 76.6%; belimumab: 81.0%) completed the protocol Week 52 visit. Overall, incidence of AEs, SAEs, severe AEs, AESI, and mortality were similar between groups. In both groups, the most commonly reported SAEs by system organ class were infections and infestations (placebo: 5.9%; belimumab: 5.4%) and renal and urinary disorders (placebo: 2.2%; belimumab: 1.7%). Additionally, a greater proportion of patients experienced AESI with belimumab versus placebo for post-infusion/injection systemic reactions (placebo: 8.1%; belimumab: 10.2%). Mortality rates were similar between groups (placebo: 0.4%; belimumab: 0.6%).

conclusionsThese results are consistent with those of the individual studies, BASE, BLISS-LN, and long-term extension studies, making belimumab one of the most studied SLE treatments for safety. Collectively, this evidence continues to support a positive benefit-risk profile of belimumab in the treatment of adult patients with SLE.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbelimumabImmunosuppressive Agentsautoimmune diseasesbelimumabbiological productssafetysystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID36206400
PMCPMC9679798
OpenAlexW4303453591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.