ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2022
Sex differences in contextual fear learning and generalization: a behavioral and computational analysis of hippocampal functioning.
Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex- and Region-Dependent Differences in Sharp Wave-Ripples Along the Long Axis of the Hippocampus.Cells · 2026Article
- Social valence dictates sex differences in identity recognition.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- PMAT enhances sexual dimorphism of fear behaviors and facilitates female mice's generalized contextual fear extinction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Sex-specific exploration accounts for differences in valence learning in male and female mice.eLife · 2025Article
- Effect of chronic alcohol exposure and single-prolonged stress on conditioned fear behavior.Behavioural brain research · 2025Article
- Sex differences in contextual fear expression are associated with altered medial prefrontal cortex activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Sex and the facilitation of cued fear by prior contextual fear conditioning in rats.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Domain-selective and sex-dependent regulation of learning and memory in mice by GIRK channel activity in CA1 pyramidal neurons of the dorsal hippocampus.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Sex-dependent effects of acute stress in adolescence or adulthood on appetitive motivation.Psychopharmacology · 2024Article
- Sex and the facilitation of cued fear by prior contextual fear conditioning in rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Pharmacological diacylglycerol lipase inhibition impairs contextual fear extinction in mice.Psychopharmacology · 2024Article
- Morphine-context associative memory and locomotor sensitization in mice are modulated by sex and context in a dose-dependent manner.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- New perspectives on sex differences in learning and memory.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2023Review
- Remote memory in a Bayesian model of context fear conditioning (BaconREM).Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Multiple context discrimination in adult rats: sex variability and dynamics of time-dependent generalization of an aversive memory.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)Article
- Sex and estrous cycle effects on stress-enhanced fear learning in Long-Evans rats.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)Article
- Influence of contextual exposure on memory strength and precision for inhibitory avoidance in male and female rats.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are sex differences in anxiety disorders with regard to occurrence and severity of episodes such that females tend to experience more frequent and more severe episodes. Contextual fear learning and generalization are especially relevant to anxiety disorders, which are often defined by expressing fear and/or anxiety in safe contexts. In contextual fear conditioning, a representation of the context must first be created, and then that representation must be paired with an aversive consequence. With some variation, the experiments presented here use a 3-d procedure in which day 1 consists of pre-exposure to the to-be-shocked context, day 2 consists of a single context-shock pairing after some placement-to-shock interval (PSI), and day 3 consists of testing in either the same or a novel context. With shorter pre-exposure periods, male rats showed more contextual fear, consistent with previous literature; however, after longer pre-exposure periods, female rats showed greater contextual fear. Additionally, while pre-exposure and PSI are both periods of time prior to the shock, it was found that they were not equivalent to each other. Animals with 120 sec of pre-exposure and a 30-sec PSI show a differential level and time course of fear expression than animals who received no pre-exposure and a 150-sec PSI, and this further depended on sex of the rat. Additionally, an experiment comparing recently versus remotely acquired contextual fear was run. Males were again shown to have greater contextual fear at both time points, and this contextual fear incubated/increased over time in males but not females. To facilitate identification of what processes caused sex differences, we used BaconX, a conceptual and computational model of hippocampal contextual learning. Computational simulations using this model predicted many of our key findings. Furthermore, these simulations suggest potential mechanisms with regard to hippocampal computation; namely, an increased feature sampling rate in males, which may account for the sex differences presented here and in prior literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.