Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36206388›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2022

Revisiting sex differences in the acquisition and extinction of threat conditioning in humans.

Zhenfu Wen, Jamie Fried, Edward F Pace-Schott, Sara W Lazar, Mohammed R Milad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Sex Differences in the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhenfu WenDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Jamie FriedDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Edward F Pace-SchottDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Sara W LazarDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Mohammed R MiladDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.

Funding

The Influence of Estrogen on the Fear Extinction Network in HumansR01MH097880 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MILAD, MOHAMMED R · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
Neural Mechanisms of Fear Extinction Across Anxiety DisordersR01MH097964 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MILAD, MOHAMMED R · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
Fear extinction and sleep across the spectrum of severity in post-traumatic hyperarousalR01MH109638 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PACE-SCHOTT, EDWARD F. · 2016 to 2019
$2.5M
Structural, Functional, and Behavioral Effects of MeditationR01AT006344 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LAZAR, SARA W · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT006344NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097880NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097964NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Findings pertaining to sex differences in the acquisition and extinction of threat conditioning, a paradigm widely used to study emotional homeostasis, remain inconsistent, particularly in humans. This inconsistency is likely due to multiple factors, one of which is sample size. Here, we pooled functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and skin conductance response (SCR) data from multiple studies in healthy humans to examine sex differences during threat conditioning, extinction learning, and extinction memory recall. We observed increased functional activation in males, relative to females, in multiple parietal and frontal (medial and lateral) cortical regions during acquisition of threat conditioning and extinction learning. Females mainly exhibited higher amygdala activation during extinction memory recall to the extinguished conditioned stimulus and also while responding to the unconditioned stimulus (presentation of the shock) during threat conditioning. Whole-brain functional connectivity analyses revealed that females showed increased connectivity across multiple networks including visual, ventral attention, and somatomotor networks during late extinction learning. At the psychophysiological level, a sex difference was only observed during shock delivery, with males exhibiting higher unconditioned responses relative to females. Our findings point to minimal to no sex differences in the expression of conditioned responses during acquisition and extinction of such responses. Functional MRI findings, however, show some distinct functional activations and connectivities between the sexes. These data suggest that males and females might use different neural mechanisms, mainly related to cognitive processing, to achieve comparable levels of acquired conditioned responses to threating cues.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalAmygdalaBrainFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID36206388
PMCPMC9488021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.